This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2024. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 298
[Merged by Bors] - refactor(measure_theory/l1_space): remove one of the two definitions of L1 space #6058
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
github-actions
bot
added
the
blocked-by-other-PR
This PR depends on another PR which is still in the queue. A bot manages this label via PR comment.
label
Feb 5, 2021
sgouezel
changed the title
refactor(measure_theory/l1_space)
refactor(measure_theory/l1_space): remove one of the two definitions of L1 space
Feb 5, 2021
eric-wieser
reviewed
Feb 5, 2021
github-actions
bot
added
merge-conflict
Please `git merge origin/master` then a bot will remove this label.
and removed
blocked-by-other-PR
This PR depends on another PR which is still in the queue. A bot manages this label via PR comment.
labels
Feb 7, 2021
🎉 Great news! Looks like all the dependencies have been resolved: 💡 To add or remove a dependency please update this issue/PR description. Brought to you by Dependent Issues (:robot: ). Happy coding! |
github-actions
bot
removed
the
merge-conflict
Please `git merge origin/master` then a bot will remove this label.
label
Feb 10, 2021
sgouezel
added
the
awaiting-review
The author would like community review of the PR
label
Feb 11, 2021
urkud
reviewed
Feb 13, 2021
src/measure_theory/l1_space.lean
Outdated
Such a predicate is already available under the name `mem_ℒp 1`. We give a direct definition which | ||
is easier to use, and show that it is equivalent to `mem_ℒp 1` | ||
|
||
In the second part, we establish an API between API and the space `L¹` of equivalence classes of |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"API between API and ..." Is it intentional?
LGTM |
✌️ sgouezel can now approve this pull request. To approve and merge a pull request, simply reply with |
bors r+ |
github-actions
bot
added
ready-to-merge
All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.)
and removed
awaiting-review
The author would like community review of the PR
labels
Feb 13, 2021
bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 13, 2021
…of L1 space (#6058) Currently, we have two independent versions of the `L^1` space in mathlib: one coming from the general family of `L^p` spaces, the other one is an ad hoc construction based on the `integrable` predicate used in the construction of the Bochner integral. We remove the second construction, and use instead the `L^1` space coming from the family of `L^p` spaces to construct the Bochner integral. Still, we keep the `integrable` predicate as it is generally useful, and show that it coincides with the `mem_Lp 1` predicate.
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded: |
bors
bot
changed the title
refactor(measure_theory/l1_space): remove one of the two definitions of L1 space
[Merged by Bors] - refactor(measure_theory/l1_space): remove one of the two definitions of L1 space
Feb 13, 2021
b-mehta
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 2, 2021
…of L1 space (#6058) Currently, we have two independent versions of the `L^1` space in mathlib: one coming from the general family of `L^p` spaces, the other one is an ad hoc construction based on the `integrable` predicate used in the construction of the Bochner integral. We remove the second construction, and use instead the `L^1` space coming from the family of `L^p` spaces to construct the Bochner integral. Still, we keep the `integrable` predicate as it is generally useful, and show that it coincides with the `mem_Lp 1` predicate.
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Labels
ready-to-merge
All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.)
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently, we have two independent versions of the
L^1
space in mathlib: one coming from the general family ofL^p
spaces, the other one is an ad hoc construction based on theintegrable
predicate used in the construction of the Bochner integral.We remove the second construction, and use instead the
L^1
space coming from the family ofL^p
spaces to construct the Bochner integral. Still, we keep theintegrable
predicate as it is generally useful, and show that it coincides with themem_Lp 1
predicate.