Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

perf: use hasExprMvar in type class search #4276

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

JovanGerb
Copy link
Contributor

I'm wondering if this change has a significant effect on Mathlib, because there might be lots of universe metavariables flying around there that we don't care about.


Closes #0000 (RFC or bug issue number fixed by this PR, if any)

@JovanGerb JovanGerb marked this pull request as draft May 25, 2024 03:22
@github-actions github-actions bot added the toolchain-available A toolchain is available for this PR, at leanprover/lean4-pr-releases:pr-release-NNNN label May 25, 2024
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added a commit to leanprover-community/batteries that referenced this pull request May 25, 2024
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added a commit to leanprover-community/mathlib4 that referenced this pull request May 25, 2024
@leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added breaks-mathlib This is not necessarily a blocker for merging: but there needs to be a plan full-ci labels May 25, 2024
@leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Mathlib CI status (docs):

@semorrison
Copy link
Collaborator

The spurious Mathlib failure from lake being noisy in tests should hopefully be resolved by tomorrow.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
breaks-mathlib This is not necessarily a blocker for merging: but there needs to be a plan toolchain-available A toolchain is available for this PR, at leanprover/lean4-pr-releases:pr-release-NNNN
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants