Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Split out atomic linked list behaviors into their own datatype #814

Merged
merged 9 commits into from Oct 30, 2015

Conversation

codemercenary
Copy link
Contributor

There are some signal issues that are related to bugs with an atomic list behavior on Linux. Create a dedicated atomic linked list concept that allows us to build and test a reliable atomic linked list concept separate from the rest of signal.

  • Ensure this type can be used with polymorphic types without needing reallocation

There are some signal issues that are related to bugs with an atomic list behavior on Linux.  Create a dedicated atomic linked list concept that allows us to build and test a reliable atomic linked list concept separate from the rest of signal.
@codemercenary codemercenary force-pushed the feature-atomiclist branch 6 times, most recently from c700193 to a0c6f31 Compare October 29, 2015 00:13
@codemercenary codemercenary force-pushed the feature-atomiclist branch 5 times, most recently from fd2b0b9 to 6b110a4 Compare October 29, 2015 00:34
Side-effect is now that `callable_base` is a type we have to support for the user.
This makes the test a bunch faster and highlights the race condition more effectively
@codemercenary codemercenary force-pushed the feature-atomiclist branch 2 times, most recently from 550a0cc to 9751cee Compare October 29, 2015 01:01
@codemercenary
Copy link
Contributor Author

This test it's failing on all platforms, I think it is the root cause of our signal instability. Will investigate when I get home.

Flag was inverted accidentally, also correct invalid use of volatile
Screw it.  No way to implement this without a two-word CAS.  Just use a spin lock.
veronicaz41 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2015
Split out atomic linked list behaviors into their own datatype
@veronicaz41 veronicaz41 merged commit 343d3f3 into develop Oct 30, 2015
@veronicaz41 veronicaz41 deleted the feature-atomiclist branch October 30, 2015 04:29
@codemercenary codemercenary mentioned this pull request Oct 30, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants