Skip to content

learn-co-students/js-basics-strings-code-along-v-000

Repository files navigation

Strings Lab Introduction

Learning Goals

  • Concatenate strings with the + operator
  • Interpolate variables and other JavaScript expressions inside template literals
  • Read the MDN documentation on string methods and practice using a few

Introduction

In this lab introduction, we're going to take a deep dive into strings in JavaScript by walking through the process of running tests in the Learn environment. We're also going to familiarize ourselves with the structure and flow of JavaScript labs.

For this lab, you've just been onboarded to the dev team working on Flatbook, the world's premier Flatiron School-based social network. At the moment, the view that our users see upon logging in is pretty generic. We'd like to improve the user experience by adding some custom greeting capabilities.

Work Through Failing Tests in a JavaScript Test Suite

To start off, let's run the test suite with the learn command. Our code is currently failing all of the tests, but we expected that because we haven't done anything yet. Let's get to work!

currentUser

The first test is telling us that currentUser is not defined. Let's go to index.js and write the following code:

const currentUser = 'Grace Hopper';

Note: Generally, when the tests ask you to define something, you want to define it exactly as it's indicated in the test. But in this case, you don't have to write 'Grace Hopper', because the important part is the variable name: currentUser. You can use your own name, your pet's name, your favorite programmer's name — whatever you'd like.

Rerun the tests and you should see that the first one is passing.

Congratulations! You've just written your first passing JavaScript test!

welcomeMessage

The next failing test is similarly helpful, telling us exactly what we have to fix: welcomeMessage contains "Welcome to Flatbook, ".

Let's return to index.js and define our second variable below where we declared currentUser:

const currentUser = 'Grace Hopper';

const welcomeMessage = 'Welcome to Flatbook, ';

Rerun the tests; you should see a second passing test.

The third test tells us that welcomeMessage should contain the value stored in currentUser. This seems like it might contradict the second test a bit, but let's try it out. Let's erase 'Welcome to Flatbook, ' and set welcomeMessage equal to currentUser instead:

const currentUser = 'Grace Hopper';

const welcomeMessage = currentUser;

When we rerun the tests, we still have two passing. But now the first and third tests are passing instead of the first and second! That doesn't seem quite right.

It turns out that the tests want welcomeMessage to include both 'Welcome to Flatbook, ' and the value stored in currentUser. Maybe we can include both of them in a single string?

const currentUser = 'Grace Hopper';

const welcomeMessage = 'Welcome to Flatbook, currentUser';

If we rerun the tests, we're once again passing the second test, but we're back to failing the third test. The new error message for the third test gives us a hint about what's happening:

AssertionError: expected 'Welcome to Flatbook, currentUser' to contain 'Grace Hopper'

When JavaScript is expecting a variable to contain one thing, and it does not, that is known as an AssertionError. The test suite looked at the value stored in welcomeMessage and expected to find the string 'Grace Hopper', which is the value stored in currentUser. Instead, welcomeMessage contains the literal string "currentUser". It's important to understand the distinction:

  • currentUser is a variable that contains a string ('Grace Hopper' in our examples).
  • 'currentUser' is a stringnot a variable.

The JavaScript engine sees a matching pair of single quotes (' '), creates a new string, and assumes that everything in between the matching punctuation marks is part of that string. For example, if we add quotation marks around the first line of code that we wrote, it becomes a simple string consisting of 35 characters:

typeof "const currentUser = 'Grace Hopper';";
//=> "string"

"const currentUser = 'Grace Hopper';".length;
//=> 35

currentUser;
//=> Uncaught ReferenceError: currentUser is not defined

As demonstrated by the last line in that snippet, because we turned our code into a string it no longer functions as JavaScript code for declaring and assigning a currentUser variable.

Since we want welcomeMessage to contain both 'Welcome to Flatbook, ' and the value stored in currentUser, we have two options: concatenation and interpolation.

Concatenate Strings with the + Operator

String concatenation is a way to take two strings and add one to the other, creating a single, longer string. The easiest way to concatenate strings in JavaScript is with the + operator, like so:

"High " + "five!";
//=> "High five!"

"We" + ' ' + `can` + " " + 'concat' + `enate` + " as many strings " + 'as our heart ' + `desires.`;
//=> "We can concatenate as many strings as our heart desires."

Since our currentUser variable contains a string, we can concatenate it to the end of 'Welcome to Flatbook, ' to dynamically create a new string based on whatever value currentUser contains at a given moment:

const currentUser = 'Grace Hopper';

const welcomeMessage = 'Welcome to Flatbook, ' + currentUser;

If we run the test suite with our updated code, we'll see both the second and third tests passing! However, before we move on, let's talk about interpolation.

Interpolate Variables and Other JavaScript Expressions Inside Template Literals

String interpolation lets us dynamically insert values in the middle of a string. Before ES2015, we could accomplish this with concatenation:

const myString = 'concatenat';
//=> undefined

const myNumber = 20;
//=> undefined

const myBoolean = true;
//=> undefined

"It's " + myBoolean + ' that we can ' + myString + 'e values of any data type into one long ' + typeof myString + '. We could even ' + myString + 'e ' + (22 + myNumber) + " things together if we wanted to. We don't have to convert things like " + typeof myNumber + 's or ' + typeof myBoolean + 's prior to ' + myString + 'ing them. ' +

'Even if we ' + myString + 'e across multiple lines, the return value is still a single, one-line ' + typeof myString + '.';
//=> "It's true that we can concatenate values of any data type into one long string. We could even concatenate 42 things together if we wanted to. We don't have to convert things like numbers or booleans prior to concatenating them. Even if we concatenate across multiple lines, the return value is still a single, one-line string."

ES2015 introduced template literals, which removed the need for concatenation. No more + operators needed; instead variables are interpolated in by wrapping them in curly braces preceded by a dollar sign: ${yourVariable}. One other important thing: Template literals must use backticks in order to be interpreted correctly. Using single or double quotes will cause the dollar sign, curly braces and variable to be interpreted as regular string data.

const myString = 'template literal';

const myNumber = 10;

const myBoolean = false;

`Saying that interpolation with ${myString}s is better than concatenation ${90 + myNumber}% of the time is simply ${myBoolean}. But it is pretty cool!

Beware that new lines inside of a ${myString} will be preserved as new lines in the resulting ${typeof myString}!`;
//=> "Saying that interpolation with template literals is better than concatenation 100% of the time is simply false. But it is pretty cool!

// Beware that new lines inside of a template literal will be preserved as new lines in the resulting string!"

Let's rewrite our welcomeMessage to use a template literal:

const currentUser = 'Grace Hopper';

const welcomeMessage = `Welcome to Flatbook, ${currentUser}`;

The first three tests are still passing, but the fourth wants our welcomeMessage to end with an exclamation point. The fix is as simple as adding a ! as the last character in the template literal:

const currentUser = 'Grace Hopper';

const welcomeMessage = `Welcome to Flatbook, ${currentUser}!`;

Four tests down, six to go!

Read the MDN Documentation on String Methods and Practice Using a Few

excitedWelcomeMessage

Sometimes we get so excited when someone logs into their Flatbook account that we just want to shout out loud. We could copy over most of the code from welcomeMessage and then change every character to its uppercase equivalent, but as developers we try not to repeat ourselves. Instead, let's use the .toUpperCase() string method:

const currentUser = 'Grace Hopper';

const welcomeMessage = `Welcome to Flatbook, ${currentUser}!`;

const excitedWelcomeMessage = welcomeMessage.toUpperCase();

All strings in JavaScript have access to the same set of default methods, which are common operations like changing and returning a new string, searching through a string for specific character(s) and returning the match, and so on. For example, we can use .toUpperCase() and .toLowerCase() on a string to make the entire string uppercase or lowercase. There are lots of other string methods that you'll find useful at various points throughout your JavaScript programming career.

Rerun the tests; you should see the first seven tests passing. Woohoo!

shortGreeting

The mobile team at Flatbook is busy redesigning the site for smaller devices, and they're a bit concerned about how much real estate the welcomeMessage takes up on the screen. They want us to create a shorter version that truncates the currentUser's name into just their first initial.

If you take a look at the first error, you'll see that the JavaScript engine is telling us that it can't find shortGreeting:

shortGreeting
  contains "Welcome, "
    ReferenceError: shortGreeting is not defined

Once we define it in index.js:

...

const shortGreeting = '';

we see a new error from the test suite:

shortGreeting
  contains "Welcome, "
    AssertionError: expected '' to contain 'Welcome, '

It expected shortGreeting to contain the string "Welcome, ", but shortGreeting is currently an empty string, ''. We can fix that now:

...

const shortGreeting = 'Welcome, ';

Next up is another AssertionError, this one checking that shortGreeting contains the first letter from currentUser:

shortGreeting
  contains the first initial of the name stored in the 'currentUser' variable
    AssertionError: expected 'Welcome, ' to contain 'G'

To get a sense of how specific the tests are, let's start by adding the entirety of currentUser to shortGreeting:

const currentUser = 'Grace Hopper';

...

const shortGreeting = `Welcome, ${currentUser}`;

Notice that we changed the single quotes to backticks, which allows us to interpolate with ${ }.

The new error reads as follows:

shortGreeting
  contains the first initial of the name stored in the 'currentUser' variable
    AssertionError: expected 'Welcome, Grace Hopper' to not contain 'race Hopper'

The test suite checks that shortGreeting contains the first character in currentUser (G in our example) and that it doesn't contain the rest of the string (race Hopper).

There are a few different ways we could get just the first character of currentUser. The easiest would be to use bracket notation or the .charAt() method to grab the character at index 0:

'Edsger Dijkstra'[0];
//=> "E"

'Edsger Dijkstra'.charAt(0);
//=> "E"

However, it's a good practice to make our code flexible and future-proof it a bit. What if our product team decides it would be better to shorten currentName to two characters instead of one? Or three characters?

For the added flexibility, we're going to use .slice(), but you can always explore the MDN documentation on string methods to pick out your own strategy.

.slice()

Let's take a look at the documentation for .slice():

String.prototype.slice() documentation on MDN

The slice() method extracts a section of a string and returns it as a new string.

The method takes two arguments: the index at which the extraction should begin and the index before which it should end. When we talk about indexes of a string, we're talking about how to access specific characters at various points within the string. Remember, computers start counting at 0, where humans start counting at 1. Because we start at index 0 instead of 1, the index of each character in a string is always one less than the character's place in the string. The second character is at index 1, the fifth at index 4, the twelfth at index 11, and so on. The index of the last character is always one less than the length of the string:

'Edsger Dijkstra'.length;
//=> 15

'Edsger Dijkstra'[15];
//=> undefined

'Edsger Dijkstra'[14];
//=> "a"

If we omit both arguments, .slice() will return a full copy of the original string:

'Edsger Dijkstra'.slice();
//=> "Edsger Dijkstra"

If we provide a single argument, .slice() will return a copy from that index to the end of the string. For example, to grab Dijkstra's last name we could start the slice on index 7:

'Edsger Dijkstra'.slice(7);
//=> "Dijkstra"

If we wanted the first three characters of Dijkstra's name, we would specify 0 as the first argument, the index at which to start, and 3 as the second argument, the index before which to end:

'Edsger Dijkstra'.slice(0, 3);
//=> "Eds"

To satisfy our team's current specifications for shortGreeting, we need to start our slice at index 0 and end it before index 1:

currentUser.slice(0, 1);

Now, when our product team asks us to use the first two characters of currentUser, the change is as simple as currentUser.slice(0, 1)currentUser.slice(0, 2).

Add an exclamation point to the end, and the entire test suite should be passing:

const currentUser = 'Grace Hopper';

...

const shortGreeting = `Welcome, ${currentUser.slice(0, 1)}!`;

Great work!

Resources

About

No description, website, or topics provided.

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published