-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Shanghai/Agra HF #8504
Shanghai/Agra HF #8504
Conversation
2a8124f
to
c098827
Compare
Left few comments, Rest LGTM. |
You can't reference github.com/ledgerwatch/erigon/core/rawdb from erigon-lib code. Erigon lib needs to be self contained. This will need to be fixed before ci will pass. |
@anshalshukla Why introduce |
The problem is bor HF are based on block whereas ethereum now have it time based. Using |
Understood, makes sense |
46f2f72
to
dd139e4
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If I understand correctly, withdrawals shouldn't be present at all in Agra blocks. If that's the case, withdrawals must be nil
rather than an empty array.
3ea9649
to
34dbeb6
Compare
34dbeb6
to
65a2558
Compare
Causes this error on bor-mainnet node (works on the previous commit though):
|
Should be fixed by #8553 |
burntContract, introduced in PR #8504, is more generic than eip1559FeeCollector
Fixes and simplifications to PR #8504
No description provided.