-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CompositeObserver.remove() returning Observer? #33
Comments
There is a code flow that "remove one and return the rest when there are two remaining." I think CompositeObserver should be Immutable in principle, so I'll add a function that returns CompositeObserver. |
Please reopen if you have any concerns. |
Looks good. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
When I have:
How am I supposed to remove an observer from it?
doesn't work because of an implicit conversion error. Why isn't .remove() returning a CompositeObserver!E? If there is only one observer left, it could still be a CompositeObserver!E with just one element.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: