Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature request] support displaying differential coverage between builds #359

Closed
daira opened this issue Sep 9, 2014 · 4 comments
Closed

Comments

@daira
Copy link

daira commented Sep 9, 2014

i.e. not just the change in number of lines covered, but the full diff of lines covered in a given file between two specified builds (defaulting to between this and the previous reported build).

@daira
Copy link
Author

daira commented Sep 9, 2014

Also see our upstream bug [https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/ticket/623].

@kroeckx
Copy link

kroeckx commented Aug 15, 2016

It's in general rather hard to see what the coverage changed, it says something like -0.07%, and then you first have to go and look for files where the coverage gets less, but there is really no such column you can sort on. Then you just get a file that shows the coverage for the current build without an indication what the difference between the previous build is.

@ScottFreeCode
Copy link

This would still be great to get; it would make Coveralls exponentially more helpful. Also there's suport expressed for substantially the same idea, if I'm reading it right, in #459.

Besides lines, functions and branches would be nice too; Coveralls added branch coverage summaries not too long ago.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Apr 3, 2020

This issue has been automatically marked for closure because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. If your issue is still active please add a comment and we’ll review as soon as we can. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot closed this as completed Apr 10, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants