You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 20, 2024. It is now read-only.
(originally reported in Trac by @elehack on 2011-03-25 16:04:08)
In addition to our fractional holdout scheme for splitting query and probe sets for user-based crossfold evaluation, it would be useful to support leave-''N''-out and retain-''N'' protocols.
All that's required to finish this is support for retain-N protocols.
Note: This issue has been automatically migrated from Bitbucket
Created by grouplens on 2013-02-01T21:55:29.120420+00:00, last updated: 2013-03-05T18:29:43.403522+00:00
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
add a setRetain(int) method to CrossfoldCommand that sets up a retain-N partition
create a new partition class, or extend CountPartition, to support the retain-N protocol
I think it is probably best to rename CountPartition to LastNPartition, and create a FirstNPartition to implement the new logic. These classes are not part of the public interface, so it is fine to reimplement them.
We should probably also improve the JavaDoc for setHoldout and setRetain to be clear, and create a new setHoldoutFraction method (and deprecate setHoldout(double)) to make things all clear.
Note: This comment has been automatically migrated from Bitbucket
Created by @elehack on 2013-02-28T20:44:39.674033+00:00, last updated: None
Support fractional holdouts (refs #33).
* Re-implement holdout system in terms of orders and partition methods
* Add fractional holdout & parse percentages in config file
Note: This comment has been automatically migrated from Bitbucket
Created by grouplens on 2013-02-01T21:55:29.835406+00:00, last updated: None
(originally reported in Trac by @elehack on 2011-03-25 16:04:08)
In addition to our fractional holdout scheme for splitting query and probe sets for user-based crossfold evaluation, it would be useful to support leave-''N''-out and retain-''N'' protocols.
All that's required to finish this is support for retain-N protocols.
Note: This issue has been automatically migrated from Bitbucket
Created by grouplens on 2013-02-01T21:55:29.120420+00:00, last updated: 2013-03-05T18:29:43.403522+00:00
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: