Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

added a substitute method to SMTBit and SMTBitVector #94

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 30, 2019
Merged

Conversation

rdaly525
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@rdaly525
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I do not think that this change affects the negative coverage. All new code paths are covered.

@cdonovick
Copy link
Collaborator

Is there a reason this should be a method and not a function? I am reluctant to add methods to bitvector classes as it breaks their interoperability.

@rdaly525
Copy link
Collaborator Author

It is a natural method on SMTBitVectors. What is the issue with adding methods to inherited classes from AbstractBitVector? I am not changing AbstractBitVector

@cdonovick
Copy link
Collaborator

We have had problems in the past with people expecting that if it works with one version of bitvector then it works with all. Hence I would like to avoid creating cases where that is not the case but if you feel strongly that this should be a method we can pull this.

Copy link
Collaborator

@cdonovick cdonovick left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Begrudgingly

@rdaly525 rdaly525 merged commit d1cb901 into master Sep 30, 2019
@rdaly525 rdaly525 deleted the substitute branch September 30, 2019 13:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants