New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature request: long time exposure #3
Comments
Cheers! I suppose on the picam2, you could stack images, then run the algorithm against it. Cheers! Les |
I have the HQ camera and plan to try that, first. I can experiment with the exposure times. Another option I'm interested in exploring is using the diffraction films with 1000 slits/mm. Great software. I have wanted to make one of these for a long time. I was planning to use the older closed-source Windows software that does more or less the same thing. Thank you for building the software for Pi/Linux and making it open. I think you can easily make a functional, portable solution with this. Really great. |
Awesome. Let me know how you get on with the HQ cam.
There is quite a bit of interest in this stuff.
You are welcome, I hope you get some good use out of it!
…On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 7:48 AM Jarrod Smith ***@***.***> wrote:
I have the HQ camera and plan to try that, first. I can experiment with
the exposure times.
Another option I'm interested in exploring is using the diffraction films
with 1000 slits/mm.
Great software. I have wanted to make one of these for a long time. I was
planning to use the older closed-source Windows software that does more or
less the same thing. Thank you for building the software for Pi/Linux and
making it open. I think you can easily make a functional, portable solution
with this. Really great.
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#3 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AG5IEE5JQDPEBGHLSN3IIOLTKZM3DANCNFSM43PJRZDQ>
.
|
Dear @leswright1977 and @MakerMatrix, Also I thought about the movement of the spectrum in the camera picture, if the light source moves. E.g. if a star moves and I point to it with a telescope without tracking, will the spectrum in the camera also move? I am willing to try that out. Some thought about that:
Thank you for your great work so far! |
I'm all in on the astro bits. I have an EQ6 and AVX tracking mounts here. We could maybe fabricate something that interfaces with a standard 2" focuser. The challenge for me is always time, not motivation ;-) The gratings I have are in 35mm slide form, like this: Also I just found (and ordered) this for making custom sizes/shapes: They are probably cheap and abundant on ebay in every part of the world. I've noticed they tend to come from Israel. |
Just ordered all parts and I have to say I am really excited about this project! @MakerMatrix - thanks for all the ideas. I just ordered some 1000 line/mm gratings as well. From studying this ebay seller's listing, I learned two things (1) the diffraction grating was mounted ~45 degrees to incident light -- not sure why? (2) there is another, prism-type spectroscope that seems better. There also appears to be some inherent non-linearity in how the diffraction works. I am looking for a suitable c-mount zoom lens for the HQ Pi Cam. I guess I will need to test out a few C-mount CCTV lenses. Will report back once I get all the parts together. In addition to attaching this to a telescope (please let us know once anyone figure out a suitable adapter), I hope to attach this setup to a microscope camera port, so I can use this to measure the spectra of small objects and minerals. |
Dear Les,
this is a great project. Thank you for sharing! I found it via hackaday.
I am thinking about if I could use it for astronomy. Because the light sources (stars) are very dim, a long time exposure would be needed. Is there an advantage if the HQ Pi Cam is used instead of the Standard Pi cam for this case?
I just leave my thought for a long time exposure here for discussion. I more people are interested, maybe someone could implement it. Otherwise just close this ticket.
Keep up the great work :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: