Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do we need C++11 compatibility? #6

Open
levalup opened this issue Jun 18, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Do we need C++11 compatibility? #6

levalup opened this issue Jun 18, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@levalup
Copy link
Owner

levalup commented Jun 18, 2024

The current project uses the C++17 standard, and I'm wondering if anyone has a requirement to use it with lower versions of C++.

Of course, if it's below C++11, the required changes would be too extensive, so we won't consider it at the moment.

I would greatly appreciate it if you could kindly share the compiler version and C++ standard you are currently using.

@levalup levalup added the question Further information is requested label Jun 18, 2024
@levalup levalup self-assigned this Jun 18, 2024
@levalup levalup pinned this issue Jun 18, 2024
@levalup
Copy link
Owner Author

levalup commented Jun 27, 2024

C++11 supported! See r0.1.0.
It can be compatible with C++11, and C++14 and C++17 new features can also be used to optimize the code. We recommend using standards above C++14 to use libuvcxx.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant