We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I'm not sure if this is related to #115
Sometimes I would like a line like this one to be closer to the adjacent line, without requiring a whole blank line in between:
I think it always makes sense to intersect with lines you've actually touched, but shouldn't it be optional to intersect with adjacent lines?
Somewhat related, there's a cool "traintrack" effect when you lay lines very close together, for example, whenever you add a line in here...
It's auto converted to:
Shouldn't it also be possible to just have a line not converted to the traintrack pattern though?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
I'm not sure if this is related to #115
Sometimes I would like a line like this one to be closer to the adjacent line, without requiring a whole blank line in between:
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11534217/197318908-0fca8fd6-8196-4509-9ff4-0cc62818c482.png)
I think it always makes sense to intersect with lines you've actually touched, but shouldn't it be optional to intersect with adjacent lines?
Somewhat related, there's a cool "traintrack" effect when you lay lines very close together, for example, whenever you add a line in here...
It's auto converted to:
Shouldn't it also be possible to just have a line not converted to the traintrack pattern though?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: