This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 18, 2022. It is now read-only.
Update TUNAA.md #171
Open
Update TUNAA.md #171
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
I think "Admission" in 2.2 should be reconsidered. There should be optional language for membership denoted by holding an NFT in your wallet and a separate toggle for holding a sufficient number (or any number) of tokens designated by the DAO to provide membership to the DAO. Same can be said for the term "voting tokens" used in Section 2.2. My suggestions in-line are not great, but you get the idea. 2.10 should provide optionality for a ragequit by sale on the secondary market, if we envision DAOs with a free-flowing membership structure to use this document. If we don't can probably ignore all of these comments. In a couple places, I provided a few permutations of how to describe the DAO acting in accordance with its protocol-level governance mechanisms. Just food for thought. I'd prefer consistency, so pick one you like, if you think they're any good.
|
@BranDAOn is attempting to deploy a commit to the LexDAO Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I think "Admission" in 2.2 should be reconsidered. There should be optional language for membership denoted by holding an NFT in your wallet and a separate toggle for holding a sufficient number (or any number) of tokens designated by the DAO to provide membership to the DAO. Same can be said for the term "voting tokens" used in Section 2.2. My suggestions in-line are not great, but you get the idea.
2.10 should provide optionality for a ragequit by sale on the secondary market, if we envision DAOs with a free-flowing membership structure to use this document. If we don't can probably ignore all of these comments.
In a couple places, I provided a few permutations of how to describe the DAO acting in accordance with its protocol-level governance mechanisms. Just food for thought. I'd prefer consistency, so pick one you like, if you think they're any good.