Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(source): always apply timestamp format #2095

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 14, 2023
Merged

Conversation

ngjaying
Copy link
Collaborator

@ngjaying ngjaying commented Jul 14, 2023

Previously, only apply timestamp format when schema is set. Extend it to all cases.

Previously, only apply timestamp format when schema is set. Extend it to al cases.

Signed-off-by: Jiyong Huang <huangjy@emqx.io>
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 14, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and no project coverage change.

Comparison is base (e135322) 60.94% compared to head (fa13478) 60.94%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2095      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   60.94%   60.94%   -0.00%     
==========================================
  Files         280      280              
  Lines       32636    32645       +9     
==========================================
+ Hits        19890    19895       +5     
- Misses      10830    10833       +3     
- Partials     1916     1917       +1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
internal/topo/operator/preprocessor.go 75.00% <100.00%> (+0.58%) ⬆️

... and 4 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@ngjaying ngjaying requested a review from superrxan July 14, 2023 05:59
@ngjaying ngjaying marked this pull request as ready for review July 14, 2023 05:59
@ngjaying ngjaying merged commit ba602c4 into lf-edge:master Jul 14, 2023
10 of 13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants