Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

People for tooling workgroup #1

Open
edwarnicke opened this issue Jan 16, 2019 · 22 comments
Open

People for tooling workgroup #1

edwarnicke opened this issue Jan 16, 2019 · 22 comments

Comments

@edwarnicke
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@zxiiro
Copy link
Contributor

zxiiro commented Jan 16, 2019

I'd like to volunteer in this group.

1 similar comment
@morganrOL
Copy link

I'd like to volunteer in this group.

@edwarnicke
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Count me in too :)

@edwarnicke
Copy link
Collaborator Author

edwarnicke commented Jan 16, 2019

From the IRC channel:

  • Trevor B
  • RandyBias
  • Mark Berierl
  • Christophe Closset
  • Alexis de Talhouet
  • Brian Freeman
  • Eric Debeau

@edwarnicke
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@tnadeau you want in?

@edwarnicke
Copy link
Collaborator Author

edwarnicke commented Jan 16, 2019

@bdfreeman1421 welcome to the party :)

@adetalhouet
Copy link

Glad to be a part of this group.

@tnadeau
Copy link

tnadeau commented Jan 16, 2019 via email

@randybias
Copy link

I'm in.

@wenjing
Copy link

wenjing commented Jan 17, 2019

I'm in, Ed.

@edwarnicke
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This is starting to look like a party :)

Would it make sense to look at the kinds of things that are possible with modern infra first?
I could walk you through an example of Github+CircleCI (including running integration testing on packet.net) and Github+Hugo+Netlify for websites and docs if that would help folks see the space of possibilities :)

@morganrOL
Copy link

on our side, we moved to gitlab even if we keep github for legacy repositories + some features.
We really appreciate the built-in CI/CD and artifact/web features from gitlab.
As gitlab is opensource (unlike github) it is possible to have an internal instance (for bare metal automation we do not want to host some security information outside our servers) and public gitlab.
The CI/CD can chain pipelines on both sides (see ONS Europe presentation: https://events.linuxfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Orange-Openlab-A-Full-Automated-Telco-Stack-for-the-Community-David-Blaisonneau-Nicolas-Edel-Orange.pdf). The integration with kubernetes is also very convenient.
The management of artifacts is easy and the possibility to automatically create a web site is also a nice feature.
github remains cool for its link to docker hub.

ref:
https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/ci/
https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/administration/pages/#doc-nav

@edwarnicke
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@morganrOL Lets put gitlab on the table as well as an option then. It tends to have almost as good ecosystem link ins as github.

@edwarnicke
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I've put up a doodle poll for a kickoff meeting time:

https://doodle.com/poll/hsz7p59np3wbf7hp

Please weigh in :)

@bramwelt
Copy link

Count me in too!

@kfaseela
Copy link

Interested!

@askb
Copy link

askb commented Jan 28, 2019

+1. want to volunteer.

@edwarnicke
Copy link
Collaborator Author

OK ... doodle poll says Fri 8am PT. Please subscribe to this calendar to get the invite:

https://calendar.google.com/calendar?cid=NnVnMzdpYnBidG9vaXY3MXY5azUyaGlxbzRAZ3JvdXAuY2FsZW5kYXIuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbQ

@zxiiro Could you get us a zoom meeting we could use instead of my webex which is currently on it?

@zxiiro
Copy link
Contributor

zxiiro commented Jan 29, 2019

@edwarnicke looks like Casey took care of the Zoom meeting but let me know if there's anything else I can help with :)

@mnaser
Copy link

mnaser commented Feb 7, 2019

I'd like to perhaps propose showing off Zuul for one of the calls if that works?

@vmbrasseur
Copy link

@mnaser LF doesn't support Zuul, alas. Tungsten Fabric is required to move off it in its transition to LFN.

@mnaser
Copy link

mnaser commented Feb 7, 2019

@vmbrasseur I think this is about looking into new potential tooling (and we've provided hosted/managed/supported Zuul, so I wanted to know if that option is open to be explored).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests