-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 129
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: strengthen tests for bessely0
function
#3712
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Requested changes above.
bessely0
function
bessely0
functionbessely0
function
Done @Pranavchiku, thanks for letting me know a better way to manage this tests |
Would you mind adding test for large positive values? |
I will add them @Pranavchiku |
15a8b60
to
9e316c9
Compare
expected = [ 7.9836428649154907E-155_dp,-7.0751499885966513E-155_dp, 4.4632457212022053E-155_dp, -7.7717941781117305E-156_dp, & | ||
-2.1476418943648812E-002_dp, 0.45752410314844527_dp, -3.6134118144921369E-003_dp, -1.1810118244863275_dp, & | ||
5.7258225070763252E-002_dp, -1.9980991452871046E-002_dp, 0.27136794388300378_dp, 0.26703177612919299_dp, & |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
same comment here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor comments, do that and this is good to merge.
As suggested by @Pranavchiku I have added more tests for bessel_y0 function for rigorous testing.