-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 279
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ruby 3.2 compatibility fix is not yet released #943
Comments
ruby 3.2 is released and rugged install fails |
@Vasfed Which version did you install and how did you install it? |
@PikachuEXE you're correct, that was 1.0.1, had to switch both gems to use github gem 'rugged', github: 'libgit2/rugged', submodules: true
gem 'pronto', '>= 0.11', github: 'prontolabs/pronto', require: false |
Hi @Vasfed and @PikachuEXE, Pronto has a new release. |
Older versions of `rugged` error when used with Ruby 3.2.0: libgit2/rugged#943
are there any plans to release this to rubygems? |
@tomstuart what is the reason for this? Any updates so far? I am getting quite a few warnings:
|
No idea, sorry, just summarising what I learned from the commit history. Presumably #935 will be included in the next release, but there hasn’t been one since v1.5.1 in January. |
#935 Seems to be included in v1.6.2: https://my.diffend.io/gems/rugged/1.5.1/1.6.2 Weirdly enough there are no v1.6.0 and v1.6.1. |
This was indeed fixed in v1.6.2. |
#935, which fixes a warning in Ruby 3.2, was merged in July but missed the most recent
rugged
release by two days.Ruby 3.2 will come out later this month and it’d be great if there was a new version of
rugged
containing this fix so that people upgrading to Ruby 3.2 don’t get the warning.Could we have a new release between now and Christmas, please?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: