New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix regression test failures #5
Labels
Milestone
Comments
liblit
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 17, 2018
<#5> notes that several subprojects' tests are currently broken under Gradle. I'd still like to be able to run non-broken tests, though. So here I'm disabling the failing tests. The intent is to treat these exclusions as a to-do list. We can remove exclusions as we get the corresponding tests working. No more exclusions means <#5> is fixed.
liblit
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 17, 2018
Many tests are excluded until <#5> is fixed. But we can at least have Travis-CI watching over our shoulder to ensure that no *new* regressions sneak into the tree.
liblit
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 17, 2018
<#5> notes that several subprojects' tests are currently broken under Gradle. I'd still like to be able to run non-broken tests, though. So here I'm disabling the failing tests. The intent is to treat these exclusions as a to-do list. We can remove exclusions as we get the corresponding tests working. No more exclusions means <#5> is fixed.
liblit
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 17, 2018
Many tests are excluded until <#5> is fixed. But we can at least have Travis-CI watching over our shoulder to ensure that no *new* regressions sneak into the tree.
liblit
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 17, 2018
<#5> notes that several subprojects' tests are currently broken under Gradle. I'd still like to be able to run non-broken tests, though. So here I'm disabling the failing tests. The intent is to treat these exclusions as a to-do list. We can remove exclusions as we get the corresponding tests working. No more exclusions means <#5> is fixed.
liblit
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 17, 2018
Many tests are excluded until <#5> is fixed. But we can at least have Travis-CI watching over our shoulder to ensure that no *new* regressions sneak into the tree.
liblit
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 17, 2018
<#5> notes that several subprojects' tests are currently broken under Gradle. I'd still like to be able to run non-broken tests, though. So here I'm disabling the failing tests. The intent is to treat these exclusions as a to-do list. We can remove exclusions as we get the corresponding tests working. No more exclusions means <#5> is fixed.
liblit
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 17, 2018
Many tests are excluded until <#5> is fixed. But we can at least have Travis-CI watching over our shoulder to ensure that no *new* regressions sneak into the tree.
liblit
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 18, 2018
<#5> notes that several subprojects' tests are currently broken under Gradle. I'd still like to be able to run non-broken tests, though. So here I'm disabling the failing tests. The intent is to treat these exclusions as a to-do list. We can remove exclusions as we get the corresponding tests working. No more exclusions means <#5> is fixed.
liblit
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 18, 2018
Many tests are excluded until <#5> is fixed. But we can at least have Travis-CI watching over our shoulder to ensure that no *new* regressions sneak into the tree.
liblit
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 17, 2018
<#5> notes that several subprojects' tests are currently broken under Gradle. I'd still like to be able to run non-broken tests, though. So here I'm disabling the failing tests. The intent is to treat these exclusions as a to-do list. We can remove exclusions as we get the corresponding tests working. No more exclusions means <#5> is fixed.
liblit
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 17, 2018
Many tests are excluded until <#5> is fixed. But we can at least have Travis-CI watching over our shoulder to ensure that no *new* regressions sneak into the tree.
liblit
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 18, 2018
<#5> notes that several subprojects' tests are currently broken under Gradle. I'd still like to be able to run non-broken tests, though. So here I'm disabling the failing tests. The intent is to treat these exclusions as a to-do list. We can remove exclusions as we get the corresponding tests working. No more exclusions means <#5> is fixed.
liblit
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 18, 2018
Many tests are excluded until <#5> is fixed. But we can at least have Travis-CI watching over our shoulder to ensure that no *new* regressions sneak into the tree.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Use
./gradelw test
to run WALA’s automated regression tests. Several test suite subprojects pass completely. However, at least the following fail:com.ibm.wala.cast.js.rhino.test
com.ibm.wala.cast.js.test
com.ibm.wala.core.tests
DynamicCallGraphTest
GetTargetsTest
PruneArrayOutOfBoundExceptionEdge
com.ibm.wala.dalvik.test
DynamicDalvikComparisonTestForAndroidLibs
com.ibm.wala.ide.jdt.test
ECJJavaIRTest
ECJSyncDuplicatorTest
JDTJava15IRTests
JDTJavaIRTests
com.ibm.wala.ide.jsdt.tests
JSProjectScopeTest
I believe that many of these failures are due to resource path / class loader problems. WALA tests commonly need to find other files within the WALA source tree, and use Java class loader facilities to do that. In order for that process to work, Gradle needs to copy the appropriate files into the appropriate run-time resource directories, Gradle needs to set run-time class paths to include those directories, and the test code itself needs to use class loaders that use those class paths.
For the test suites that pass, I have already successfully gotten the class loaders to find the right resources. For the test suites that fail, I am apparently not yet doing this correctly. Some of the testing infrastructure uses class loaders in complex ways, so here I will probably need help from more-experienced WALA maintainers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: