You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the mailing list, Gothos reported that adding bat0 in the br-lan bridge partially fixed the issues found when using the current LibreMesh code on top of OpenWrt 21.02 and 22.03.
With swconfig (approx OpenWrt 19.07), the interfaces included in br-lan were defined like this in /etc/config/network (see full file in #951 (comment)):
config interface 'lan'
option type 'bridge'
option ifname 'eth0.1'
[...]
but with DSA (approx OpenWrt 21.02 and 22.03), now this section only contains the IP configuration, while the bridged interfaces list are defined in another section of the same file:
config device
option name 'br-lan'
option type 'bridge'
list ports 'lan1'
list ports 'lan2'
list ports 'lan3'
list ports 'lan4'
This causes that, on recent OpenWrt releases, the bat0 interface gets added to the bridge in the old way by proto/lan.lua from lime-system, that does not work with DSA-style configuration:
In the mailing list, Gothos reported that adding bat0 in the br-lan bridge partially fixed the issues found when using the current LibreMesh code on top of OpenWrt 21.02 and 22.03.
With swconfig (approx OpenWrt 19.07), the interfaces included in br-lan were defined like this in
/etc/config/network
(see full file in #951 (comment)):but with DSA (approx OpenWrt 21.02 and 22.03), now this section only contains the IP configuration, while the bridged interfaces list are defined in another section of the same file:
This causes that, on recent OpenWrt releases, the
bat0
interface gets added to the bridge in the old way byproto/lan.lua
fromlime-system
, that does not work with DSA-style configuration:lime-packages/packages/lime-system/files/usr/lib/lua/lime/proto/lan.lua
Line 59 in 06399e5
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: