Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Core options vs Conf file options #79

Open
sionisaac opened this issue Nov 4, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Core options vs Conf file options #79

sionisaac opened this issue Nov 4, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@sionisaac
Copy link

I really like this dosbox core and for the most part it works great. The main issue I have is certain games will only work if i disable core options and load the game from a conf file with all my settings (this works fine with standalone dosbox too). My preffered method for loading games in dosbox is by conf file. But when it comes to the retroarch side and all the options I havent got a clue what they mean. I thought the options were supposed to reflect settings in dosbox conf. But I've found that none or hardly any of the headings match the ones in the conf files. The crux of the matter is I want mouse emulation with my gamepad. But if I can only load certain games by switching off core options and loading from conf (BANG goes mouse emulation).

Is this issue going to be addressed?
Will the core options ever represent a WORD for WORD duplication of the conf options (Does the current setup really help those people who know nothing about how to configure dosbox)?
I'm happy to continue to use conf files and junk the retroarch options but there has to be a way to enable mouse emulation from gamepad as well as using conf configurations.

@realnc
Copy link
Collaborator

realnc commented Nov 4, 2021

This core is outdated and not actively maintained anymore. Use "DOSBox-core" instead:

https://github.com/realnc/dosbox-core#dosbox-core

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants