Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tests failing on s390x (1.7.0-rc2) on Fedora rawhide #464

Open
spotaws opened this issue Feb 20, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

tests failing on s390x (1.7.0-rc2) on Fedora rawhide #464

spotaws opened this issue Feb 20, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@spotaws
Copy link

spotaws commented Feb 20, 2023

(note that the log reports 1.7-rc1, but source is built from the 1.7.0-rc2 tag)

   libunwind 1.7-rc1: tests/test-suite.log
=============================================
# TOTAL: 32
# PASS:  29
# SKIP:  0
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL:  3
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0
.. contents:: :depth: 2
FAIL: Gtest-resume-sig-rt
=========================
FAIL Gtest-resume-sig-rt (exit status: 134)
FAIL: Ltest-resume-sig-rt
=========================
FAIL Ltest-resume-sig-rt (exit status: 134)
FAIL: test-ptrace
=================
Automated test (self,ls,/,(null))
FAILURE: unw_step() returned -8 for ip=3ff9c50dbd8 (start ip=3ff9c89fbc6)
unwind failed with ret=-8
FAILURE: unw_step() returned -8 for ip=3ff9c700890 (start ip=3ff9c89fbc6)
unwind failed with ret=-8
FAILURE: unw_step() returned -8 for ip=3ff9c781868 (start ip=3ff9c89fbc6)
unwind failed with ret=-8
FAILURE: unw_step() returned -8 for ip=3ff9c8acf98 (start ip=3ff9c615ff6)
unwind failed with ret=-8
FAILURE: unw_step() returned -8 for ip=3ff9c8acf98 (start ip=3ff9c5e74b6)
unwind failed with ret=-8
FAILURE: unw_step() returned -8 for ip=3ff9c8acf98 (start ip=3ff9c5e74b6)
unwind failed with ret=-8
FAILURE: detected 12 errors
FAIL test-ptrace (exit status: 255)
@sharkcz
Copy link
Contributor

sharkcz commented Feb 20, 2023

FWIW all tests from the master branch seems to be passing OK on Fedora 36 on s390x

liuyangxy pushed a commit to fedora-riscv/libunwind that referenced this issue Feb 21, 2023
@bkmgit bkmgit mentioned this issue Feb 22, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants