Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

uv_buf_t: Document member fields. #307

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

uv_buf_t: Document member fields. #307

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

coreyfarrell
Copy link
Contributor

It is sometimes useful to read the base pointer or length stored in a uv_buf_t. This change documents those fields.

This is a followup to issue #305. I'm unsure if it's important to document the difference with Windows since it seems to have no effect on source compatibility.

@saghul
Copy link
Member

saghul commented Apr 7, 2015

Thanks Corey! Can you pleas use the "..c:member" syntax instead? Look at any other type, that's how we've documented structure members.

@coreyfarrell
Copy link
Contributor Author

I actually copied the format used by all other structures in misc.rst! Anyways I've just updated this as requested.

@saghul
Copy link
Member

saghul commented Apr 7, 2015

LGTM, thanks! Can you please squash the commit messages into one? Also, please adjust the commit message to something like "doc: document uv_buf_t members".

It is sometimes useful to read the base pointer or length stored in a
uv_buf_t.  This change documents those fields.
@coreyfarrell
Copy link
Contributor Author

Squashed, commit msg first line updated.

saghul pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2015
PR-URL: #307
Reviewed-By: Saúl Ibarra Corretgé <saghul@gmail.com>
@saghul
Copy link
Member

saghul commented Apr 7, 2015

Thanks Corey! Landed in e2e218b

@saghul saghul closed this Apr 7, 2015
@coreyfarrell coreyfarrell deleted the uv_buf_t-member-docs branch April 11, 2015 09:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants