You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm processing some 257-channel hyperspectral images (256 reflectances and a mask) and I encountered an error message that simply says "bad bands". I see that comes as a hard-coded limit of 256 bands here: arithmetic.c.
I would also like to start using vips to process raw files from our macro-XRF setup, which implies a need to deal in 4096-channel images.
The .v file format specification allocates 4 bytes for the band count, but I assume that the 256-band limit comes from 1 byte being allocated to store the band count somewhere internally. Is this a limitation that would be straightforward to extend?
Many thanks in advance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi John,
I'm processing some 257-channel hyperspectral images (256 reflectances and a mask) and I encountered an error message that simply says "bad bands". I see that comes as a hard-coded limit of 256 bands here: arithmetic.c.
I would also like to start using vips to process raw files from our macro-XRF setup, which implies a need to deal in 4096-channel images.
The .v file format specification allocates 4 bytes for the band count, but I assume that the 256-band limit comes from 1 byte being allocated to store the band count somewhere internally. Is this a limitation that would be straightforward to extend?
Many thanks in advance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: