Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lightning Specification Meeting 2023/08/28 #1103

Closed
12 of 23 tasks
t-bast opened this issue Aug 23, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed
12 of 23 tasks

Lightning Specification Meeting 2023/08/28 #1103

t-bast opened this issue Aug 23, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@t-bast
Copy link
Collaborator

t-bast commented Aug 23, 2023

The meeting will take place on Monday 2023/08/28 at 8pm UTC (5:30am Adelaide time) on Libera Chat IRC #lightning-dev. It is open to the public.

A video link is available for higher bandwidth communication: https://meet.jit.si/Lightning-Spec-Meeting

Recently Updated Proposals / Seeking Review

This section contains changes that have been opened or updated recently and need feedback from the meeting participants.

Stale Proposals

This section contains pending changes that may not need feedback from the meeting participants, unless someone explicitly asks for it during the meeting. These changes are usually waiting for implementation work to happen to drive more feedback.

Waiting for interop

This section contains changes that have been conceptually ACKed and are waiting for at least two implementations to fully interoperate.
They most likely don't need to be covered during the meeting, unless someone asks for updates.

Long Term Updates

This section contains long-term changes that need review, but require a substantial implementation effort.

@t-bast t-bast pinned this issue Aug 23, 2023
@ariard
Copy link
Contributor

ariard commented Aug 31, 2023

If there is enough compatibility testing between 2 implementations on #851, maybe it could be marked as finalized or landed. I think this is kinda a blocker to review / implement #863 as it unclear if it strictly building on it.

@t-bast
Copy link
Collaborator Author

t-bast commented Aug 31, 2023

If there is enough compatibility testing between 2 implementations on #851, maybe it could be marked as finalized or landed.

We're getting close, but we're still missing interop tests on the channel_reestablish part. @niftynei is working on finalizing those on cln. Once those tests are done, we can do a final rebase of that PR and merge it 🚀

@t-bast t-bast unpinned this issue Sep 8, 2023
@t-bast t-bast closed this as completed Sep 8, 2023
@carlaKC
Copy link
Contributor

carlaKC commented Sep 21, 2023

Transcript: bitcointranscripts/bitcointranscripts#275

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants