Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

BOLT 7 : SHOULD accept channel_update for its own channel, ambiguity on forwading parameters #536

Closed
ariard opened this issue Dec 16, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

BOLT 7 : SHOULD accept channel_update for its own channel, ambiguity on forwading parameters #536

ariard opened this issue Dec 16, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@ariard
Copy link
Contributor

ariard commented Dec 16, 2018

"SHOULD accept channel_updates for its own channels (even if non-public), in order to learn the associated origin nodes' forwarding parameters". If we have topology A <--> B <--> C, what does forwarding parameters mean here ? Policy apply by B on link B -> C, or on link A <- B, or on link A -> B as relaying node ?

More context: lightningdevkit/rust-lightning#207 (comment)
@TheBlueMatt TheBlueMatt mentioned this issue Aug 19, 2019
Merged
@ariard
Copy link
Contributor Author

ariard commented Mar 16, 2021

Closed by lightningdevkit/rust-lightning#841

@ariard ariard closed this as completed Mar 16, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@ariard