Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

vagrant-lxc and stack to deep #70

Closed
krtek4 opened this issue Feb 3, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed

vagrant-lxc and stack to deep #70

krtek4 opened this issue Feb 3, 2016 · 4 comments

Comments

@krtek4
Copy link
Contributor

krtek4 commented Feb 3, 2016

We have a workaround to set the provisionner to ansible when the lxc provider is used in order to avoid fgrehm/vagrant-lxc#398

However this does not work if the provider is not set explicitly and sadly on Linux the LXC provider is chosen by default after the Vagrantfile is ran, so there's also no way to know it will be used before it's too late :(

We should at least document that.

References

@krtek4
Copy link
Contributor Author

krtek4 commented May 9, 2016

Seems to be not lxc related : hashicorp/vagrant#6984

@krtek4
Copy link
Contributor Author

krtek4 commented Jun 1, 2016

There's been some movements on hashicorp/vagrant#6984

A fix was just pushed to vagrant. So we can expect this to be resolved in the next Vagrant version :)

@krtek4
Copy link
Contributor Author

krtek4 commented Jun 10, 2016

New vagrant version should be released today or early next week with the fix, along with other improvements on the ansible_local front ( hashicorp/vagrant@bb9dba5#commitcomment-17800415 )

Will do some cleanup just afterwards and bump the required version to 1.8.2 in the Vagrantfile as soon as I have time to do some testing !

@krtek4
Copy link
Contributor Author

krtek4 commented Jul 21, 2016

Fixed in latest Vagrant version. The hacky code was cleaned by Chregu.

@krtek4 krtek4 closed this as completed Jul 21, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant