This is a simple and naïve test to see which implementations of directory traversing is faster. DON'T take this too seriously.

blog post in Chinese

benchmark.toml is for the tool from swapview.

Result in my case:

About 10k files:

                    Rust: top:    6.60, min:    6.44, avg:    6.84, max:    7.54, mdev:    0.30, cnt:  20
                  Go_3rd: top:    9.44, min:    9.37, avg:    9.57, max:   10.22, mdev:    0.20, cnt:  20
                    find: top:   14.52, min:   14.31, avg:   14.73, max:   15.31, mdev:    0.28, cnt:  20
                      fd: top:   19.15, min:   16.49, avg:   21.18, max:   26.62, mdev:    2.40, cnt:  20
                      Go: top:   26.92, min:   26.77, avg:   27.51, max:   30.12, mdev:    0.91, cnt:  20
                  Python: top:   33.64, min:   33.18, avg:   35.19, max:   45.14, mdev:    2.75, cnt:  20
                 Python2: top:   38.40, min:   37.56, avg:   39.43, max:   43.84, mdev:    1.66, cnt:  20
                 Crystal: top:   47.81, min:   46.92, avg:   51.73, max:   77.20, mdev:    7.91, cnt:  20

About 300k files:

     fd: top:  265.80, min:  259.84, avg:  273.89, max:  319.76, mdev:   15.03, cnt:  20
   Rust: top:  269.98, min:  266.86, avg:  272.82, max:  282.84, mdev:    4.17, cnt:  20
 Go_3rd: top:  361.17, min:  359.05, avg:  363.82, max:  370.22, mdev:    3.31, cnt:  20
   find: top:  454.03, min:  450.79, avg:  458.51, max:  467.31, mdev:    5.08, cnt:  20
 Python: top:  624.80, min:  615.73, avg:  630.67, max:  640.88, mdev:    6.79, cnt:  20
     Go: top:  890.03, min:  876.98, avg:  910.63, max:  967.14, mdev:   24.84, cnt:  20
Python2: top: 1171.38, min: 1157.19, avg: 1189.99, max: 1228.09, mdev: 4186.28, cnt:  20