You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, thanks for this great resource! I'm working through the book now.
Can I confirm that the p-values published in the table of section '4.1.3 R code: Wilcoxon signed-rank test' are correct? I get different p-values for both the Wilcoxon test and the linear model using signed ranks (0.2628 and 02650 respectively). I have been able to replicate all other tests in the book so far using the toy data set. Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
They are not completely identical, as are none of the non-parametric "equivalents". In your case, p is off by 0.0022. This, you can also see in the website version.
My apologies, I see the problem - it was to do with the toy data. When reproducing your work I created the toy data sets in a different order (x, y, y2 instead of y, x, y2). When I ran it again I get the same results as you.
Hi, thanks for this great resource! I'm working through the book now.
Can I confirm that the p-values published in the table of section '4.1.3 R code: Wilcoxon signed-rank test' are correct? I get different p-values for both the Wilcoxon test and the linear model using signed ranks (0.2628 and 02650 respectively). I have been able to replicate all other tests in the book so far using the toy data set. Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: