You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was discussing the group sorting the other day with a customer and we could not come up with a comprehensible explanation how the group sorting is working for categorical columns. Maybe you can help us here.
Without group sorting (i.e., aggregation only) the pattern of the groups is clear and follows the group hierarchy.
However, once I sort the groups by Cat4 the pattern looks totally different. The groups do not follow the group hierarchy, but it is also not obvious that they are sorted by Cat4. There is a slight pattern that the groups are first sorted by d1 and then d2, but the sorting criteria itself is not obvious.
Question
@sgratzl Could you please explain how the groups are sorted in this example?
P.S. We discuss the group sorting also in PR #273 (review), but I did not sort the groups by a categorical column that is not used in the group hierarchy.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I was discussing the group sorting the other day with a customer and we could not come up with a comprehensible explanation how the group sorting is working for categorical columns. Maybe you can help us here.
Steps to reproduce
Observed behavior
Without group sorting (i.e., aggregation only) the pattern of the groups is clear and follows the group hierarchy.
However, once I sort the groups by Cat4 the pattern looks totally different. The groups do not follow the group hierarchy, but it is also not obvious that they are sorted by Cat4. There is a slight pattern that the groups are first sorted by
d1
and thend2
, but the sorting criteria itself is not obvious.Question
@sgratzl Could you please explain how the groups are sorted in this example?
P.S. We discuss the group sorting also in PR #273 (review), but I did not sort the groups by a categorical column that is not used in the group hierarchy.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: