Issues/76

[goofballLogic]

Closes #76

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #77 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #77   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   68.59%   68.59%           
=======================================
  Files          22       22           
  Lines        4053     4053           
  Branches     1028     1028           
=======================================
  Hits         2780     2780           
  Misses       1130     1130           
  Partials      143      143           

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/json-ld.net/Core/Context.cs	89.56% <ø> (ø)
src/json-ld.net/Core/JsonLdError.cs	95.14% <ø> (ø)
src/json-ld.net/Core/JsonLdUtils.cs	27.98% <ø> (ø)
src/json-ld.net/Core/RDFDatasetUtils.cs	54.80% <ø> (ø)
src/json-ld.net/Core/UniqueNamer.cs	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/json-ld.net/Impl/NQuadRDFParser.cs	25.00% <ø> (ø)
src/json-ld.net/Impl/NQuadTripleCallback.cs	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/json-ld.net/Impl/TurtleRDFParser.cs	55.42% <ø> (ø)
src/json-ld.net/Impl/TurtleTripleCallback.cs	0.00% <ø> (ø)
src/json-ld.net/Util/JSONUtils.cs	21.62% <ø> (ø)
... and 3 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update be00189...7c89109. Read the comment docs.

[asbjornu]

This will have to be released under a new major version, no?

[goofballLogic]

This will have to be released under a new major version, no?

Yeah I'm wondering if we should merge this to a new major version branch instead? Because, we might want to refine the API a bit more if we're doing a major release anyway.

[asbjornu]

I don't think we need another branch for that, we can always just branch out from tag 1.0.6 to support/1.x if we want to do another 1.x release. But then I think we can safely create a 2.0.0 milestone we can add this and possibly other issues to.