-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Concept association, case m:n #86
Comments
What exactely is meant by "(c, d)" and "c +d"?
…On 20. März 2017 16:05:22 MEZ, catecara ***@***.***> wrote:
The m:n correspondence between classification items in classification
systems can be expressed in the following way (example below taken from
Guidelines on FAO. 2015. International Classifications for Agricultural
Statistics):
Let items a, b belong to Classification A; item c, d belong to
Classification B.
e.g.
a = meat of cattle and buffalo fresh
b = meat of cattle and buffalo frozen
c = meat of cattle fresh and frozen
d = meat of buffalo fresh and frozen
Then,
(i) a corresponds to (c, d)
(ii) b corresponds to (c, d)
(iii) and together : a+b = c +d (in terms of classified data)
The current proposal seem to capture (iii) but not (i) and (ii). I
wonder whether all three correspondences should be rendered.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#86
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
|
Hope the wording is clearer now. |
So there can be more correspondences:
|
|
The m:n correspondence between classification items in classification systems can be expressed in the following way (example below taken from Guidelines on FAO. 2015. International Classifications for Agricultural Statistics):
Let items a, b belong to Classification A; item c, d belong to Classification B.
e.g.
a = meat of cattle and buffalo fresh
b = meat of cattle and buffalo frozen
c = meat of cattle fresh and frozen
d = meat of buffalo fresh and frozen
Then,
(i) a corresponds to (c, d)
(ii) b corresponds to (c, d)
(iii) and together : a+b = c +d (in terms of classified data)
The current proposal seem to capture (iii) but not (i) and (ii). The rendering of (i) and (ii) should be discussed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: