Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Continue to support losely specified older Kafka versions #720

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 7, 2021

Conversation

jyates
Copy link
Contributor

@jyates jyates commented Oct 7, 2021

To avoid breaking existing configurations where users either losely
specify a kafka version - like 0.10.2 - we should continue to support
that configuration. However, Sarama handles most of the version parsing
still, we have some fallbacks ready to support existing configs.

Essentially adds back in support for existing configs that was removed in #715

To avoid breaking existing configurations where users either losely
specify a kafka version - like 0.10.2 - we should continue to support
that configuration. However, Sarama handles most of the version parsing
still, we have some fallbacks ready to support existing configs.
@jyates jyates requested a review from bai as a code owner October 7, 2021 15:08
Copy link
Collaborator

@bai bai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for fixing this, that's unfortunate but 🤷‍♂️

@bai bai merged commit 8f6126b into linkedin:master Oct 7, 2021
@jyates
Copy link
Contributor Author

jyates commented Oct 7, 2021

No worries. I think it would be reasonable to drop the wonky version support if there was a new major version for Burrow. But that might be a lot for just this small stuff :)

@jyates jyates deleted the align-version-lookup branch October 7, 2021 15:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants