Support type nesting in schema definitions

[nphase]

Hi! Are there any plans to support type nesting in schema definitions, similar to this example below (taken from SO)? See references to com.company.model.AddressRecord:

{
    "type": "record",
    "namespace": "com.company.model",
    "name": "AddressRecord",
    "fields": [
        {
            "name": "streetaddress",
            "type": "string"
        },
        {
            "name": "city",
            "type": "string"
        },
        {
            "name": "state",
            "type": "string"
        },
        {
            "name": "zip",
            "type": "string"
        }
    ]
},
{
    "namespace": "com.company.model",
    "type": "record",
    "name": "Customer",
    "fields": [
        {
            "name": "firstname",
            "type": "string"
        },
        {
            "name": "lastname",
            "type": "string"
        },
        {
            "name": "email",
            "type": "string"
        },
        {
            "name": "phone",
            "type": "string"
        },
        {
            "name": "address",
            "type": {
                "type": "array",
                "items": "com.company.model.AddressRecord"
            }
        }
    ]
},
{
    "namespace": "com.company.model",
    "type": "record",
    "name": "Customer2",
    "fields": [
        {
            "name": "x",
            "type": "string"
        },
        {
            "name": "y",
            "type": "string"
        },
        {
            "name": "address",
            "type": {
                "type": "array",
                "items": "com.company.model.AddressRecord"
            }
        }
    ]
}
]

[karrick]

@nphase,

Yes! I have fixed this issue in the library rewrite located at https://github.com/karrick/goavro

That version of the library properly supports nesting and recursive data structures.