-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
init="request" for object of type "20.102" does not trigger a read group address on the bus at startup #60
Comments
for some reason the form did not keep the pasted object declaration. Let me try again: |
nope. I attach the declaration excerpt here. |
Hi, A few leads to follow:
Thanks! PS: to insert your configuration excerpt, make sure to enclose it with triple backticks like so:
It forces markdown to interpret the text as plain text, so that it is not confused by XML content. The output would be like this:
|
Many thanks, Cyrille, for your quick answer and your hints. You helped me to understand how initialization works and to solve the issue.
To explain a bit, I have several rules that I use to trigger on update of an object, the condition does not have a "value" clause, just the "trigger" clause. This does not cause linknx to send a read on the bus, while the code above does. I therefore replaced the missing "value" clause with a clause which is always true to obtain the behavior I want. |
I have the following object declaration:
when I start linknx, it writes a read request on the bus for the first object, but not for the second. If I manually place a read request on the bus using knxtool groupread, the object gets updated correctly by the read response.
I'm using linknx 1.38 with knxd. I look into what linknx writes using knxtool groupsocketlisten.
If somebody can givme a hint on where to look, I can work out a fix to propose.
Thanks
Ste
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: