Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

soc: sifive: shunt ccache driver to drivers/cache #130

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

bjoto
Copy link

@bjoto bjoto commented Oct 12, 2023

Pull request for series with
subject: soc: sifive: shunt ccache driver to drivers/cache
version: 1
url: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/list/?series=792501

@bjoto
Copy link
Author

bjoto commented Oct 12, 2023

Upstream branch: 9f564b9
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/list/?series=792501
version: 1

Pull request is NOT updated. Failed to apply https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/list/?series=792501
error message:

Cmd('git') failed due to: exit code(128)
  cmdline: git am -s --3way
  stdout: 'Applying: soc: sifive: shunt ccache driver to drivers/cache
Patch failed at 0001 soc: sifive: shunt ccache driver to drivers/cache
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".'
  stderr: 'error: sha1 information is lacking or useless (drivers/soc/sifive/Kconfig).
error: could not build fake ancestor
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch'

conflict:


@bjoto
Copy link
Author

bjoto commented Nov 22, 2023

At least one diff in series https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/list/?series=792501 irrelevant now. Closing PR.

@bjoto bjoto closed this Nov 22, 2023
@bjoto bjoto deleted the series/792501=>fixes branch November 22, 2023 11:55
bjoto pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2024
Like commit 1cf3bfc ("bpf: Support 64-bit pointers to kfuncs")
for s390x, add support for 64-bit pointers to kfuncs for LoongArch.
Since the infrastructure is already implemented in BPF core, the only
thing need to be done is to override bpf_jit_supports_far_kfunc_call().

Before this change, several test_verifier tests failed:

  # ./test_verifier | grep # | grep FAIL
  #119/p calls: invalid kfunc call: ptr_to_mem to struct with non-scalar FAIL
  #120/p calls: invalid kfunc call: ptr_to_mem to struct with nesting depth > 4 FAIL
  #121/p calls: invalid kfunc call: ptr_to_mem to struct with FAM FAIL
  #122/p calls: invalid kfunc call: reg->type != PTR_TO_CTX FAIL
  #123/p calls: invalid kfunc call: void * not allowed in func proto without mem size arg FAIL
  #124/p calls: trigger reg2btf_ids[reg->type] for reg->type > __BPF_REG_TYPE_MAX FAIL
  #125/p calls: invalid kfunc call: reg->off must be zero when passed to release kfunc FAIL
  #126/p calls: invalid kfunc call: don't match first member type when passed to release kfunc FAIL
  #127/p calls: invalid kfunc call: PTR_TO_BTF_ID with negative offset FAIL
  #128/p calls: invalid kfunc call: PTR_TO_BTF_ID with variable offset FAIL
  #129/p calls: invalid kfunc call: referenced arg needs refcounted PTR_TO_BTF_ID FAIL
  #130/p calls: valid kfunc call: referenced arg needs refcounted PTR_TO_BTF_ID FAIL
  #486/p map_kptr: ref: reference state created and released on xchg FAIL

This is because the kfuncs in the loaded module are far away from
__bpf_call_base:

  ffff800002009440 t bpf_kfunc_call_test_fail1    [bpf_testmod]
  9000000002e128d8 T __bpf_call_base

The offset relative to __bpf_call_base does NOT fit in s32, which breaks
the assumption in BPF core. Enable bpf_jit_supports_far_kfunc_call() lifts
this limit.

Note that to reproduce the above result, tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
should be applied, and run the test with JIT enabled, unpriv BPF enabled.

With this change, the test_verifier tests now all passed:

  # ./test_verifier
  ...
  Summary: 777 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Tested-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
1 participant