FocalTech Touchscreen (ft5x_ts) #178
Comments
|
Sounds like the x and y are inverted. Just a guess from the symptoms. This can be adjusted in the fex file usually. Way back we had a few patches to fix inversion and multi touch on this touch screen I thought. Sent from my android device. -----Original Message----- For the A13, it was sufficient to remove IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING and multi touch from ft5x_ts source. For A20 (running on an unlisted tablet, screen resolution: 1024x600 ) this doesn't work completely. The touch works but the calibration is all haywire and only 2/3 of the screen works. I don't really know if it is because if the screen resolution or something else. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: |
|
When you have half screen working thats could be wrong firmware you uploaded to ts ic, you should extract original fw and use |
amery
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 2, 2014
No need for rht_dereference() from rhashtable_destroy() since the existing callers don't hold the mutex when invoking this function from: 1) Netlink, this is called in case of memory allocation errors in the initialization path, no nl_sk_hash_lock is held. 2) Netfilter, this is called from the rcu callback, no nfnl_lock is held either. I think it's reasonable to assume that the caller has to make sure that no hash resizing may happen before releasing the bucket array. Therefore, the caller should be responsible for releasing this in a safe way, document this to make people aware of it. This resolves a rcu lockdep splat in nft_hash: =============================== [ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ] 3.16.0+ #178 Not tainted ------------------------------- lib/rhashtable.c:596 suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() usage! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by ksoftirqd/2/18: #0: (rcu_callback){......}, at: [<ffffffff810918fd>] rcu_process_callbacks+0x27e/0x4c7 stack backtrace: CPU: 2 PID: 18 Comm: ksoftirqd/2 Not tainted 3.16.0+ #178 Hardware name: LENOVO 23259H1/23259H1, BIOS G2ET32WW (1.12 ) 05/30/2012 0000000000000001 ffff88011706bb68 ffffffff8143debc 0000000000000000 ffff880117062610 ffff88011706bb98 ffffffff81077515 ffff8800ca041a50 0000000000000004 ffff8800ca386480 ffff8800ca041a00 ffff88011706bbb8 Call Trace: [<ffffffff8143debc>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68 [<ffffffff81077515>] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xfa/0x103 [<ffffffff81228b1b>] rhashtable_destroy+0x46/0x52 [<ffffffffa06f21a7>] nft_hash_destroy+0x73/0x82 [nft_hash] Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> Acked-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
amery
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 6, 2015
This patch allows the LPFC to start up without a fatal kernel bug based on an exceeded KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE and a too large NR_CPU-based maskbits field. The bug was based on the number of CPU cores in a system. Using the get_cpu_mask() function declared in kernel/cpu.c allows the driver to load on the community kernel 4.2 RC1. Below is the kernel bug reproduced: 8<-------------------------------------------------------------------- 2199382.828437 ( 0.005216)| lpfc 0003:02:00.0: enabling device (0140 -> 0142) 2199382.999272 ( 0.170835)| ------------[ cut here ]------------ 2199382.999337 ( 0.000065)| WARNING: CPU: 84 PID: 404 at mm/slab_common.c:653 kmalloc_slab+0x2f/0x89() 2199383.004534 ( 0.005197)| Modules linked in: lpfc(+) usbcore(+) mptctl scsi_transport_fc sg lpc_ich i2c_i801 usb_common tpm_tis mfd_core tpm acpi_cpufreq button scsi_dh_alua scsi_dh_rdacusbcore: registered new device driver usb 2199383.020568 ( 0.016034)| 2199383.020581 ( 0.000013)| scsi_dh_hp_sw scsi_dh_emc scsi_dh gru thermal sata_nv processor piix fan thermal_sysehci_hcd: USB 2.0 'Enhanced' Host Controller (EHCI) Driver 2199383.035288 ( 0.014707)| 2199383.035306 ( 0.000018)| hwmon ata_piix 2199383.035336 ( 0.000030)| CPU: 84 PID: 404 Comm: kworker/84:0 Not tainted 3.18.0-rc2-gat-00106-ga7ca10f-dirty #178 2199383.047077 ( 0.011741)| ehci-pci: EHCI PCI platform driver 2199383.047134 ( 0.000057)| Hardware name: SGI UV2000/ROMLEY, BIOS SGI UV 2000/3000 series BIOS 01/15/2013 2199383.056245 ( 0.009111)| Workqueue: events work_for_cpu_fn 2199383.066174 ( 0.009929)| 000000000000028d ffff88eef827bbe8 ffffffff815a542f 000000000000028d 2199383.069545 ( 0.003371)| ffffffff810ea142 ffff88eef827bc28 ffffffff8104365c ffff88eefe4006c8 2199383.076214 ( 0.006669)| 0000000000000000 00000000000080d0 0000000000000000 0000000000000004 2199383.079213 ( 0.002999)| Call Trace: 2199383.084084 ( 0.004871)| [<ffffffff815a542f>] dump_stack+0x49/0x62 2199383.087283 ( 0.003199)| [<ffffffff810ea142>] ? kmalloc_slab+0x2f/0x89 2199383.091415 ( 0.004132)| [<ffffffff8104365c>] warn_slowpath_common+0x77/0x92 2199383.095197 ( 0.003782)| [<ffffffff8104368c>] warn_slowpath_null+0x15/0x17 2199383.103336 ( 0.008139)| [<ffffffff810ea142>] kmalloc_slab+0x2f/0x89 2199383.107082 ( 0.003746)| [<ffffffff8110fd9e>] __kmalloc+0x13/0x16a 2199383.112531 ( 0.005449)| [<ffffffffa01a8ed9>] lpfc_pci_probe_one_s4+0x105b/0x1644 [lpfc] 2199383.115316 ( 0.002785)| [<ffffffff81302b92>] ? pci_bus_read_config_dword+0x75/0x87 2199383.123431 ( 0.008115)| [<ffffffffa01a951f>] lpfc_pci_probe_one+0x5d/0xcb5 [lpfc] 2199383.127364 ( 0.003933)| [<ffffffff81497119>] ? dbs_check_cpu+0x168/0x177 2199383.136438 ( 0.009074)| [<ffffffff81496fa5>] ? gov_queue_work+0xb4/0xc0 2199383.140407 ( 0.003969)| [<ffffffff8130b2a1>] local_pci_probe+0x1e/0x52 2199383.143105 ( 0.002698)| [<ffffffff81052c47>] work_for_cpu_fn+0x13/0x1b 2199383.147315 ( 0.004210)| [<ffffffff81054965>] process_one_work+0x222/0x35e 2199383.151379 ( 0.004064)| [<ffffffff81054e76>] worker_thread+0x3d5/0x46e 2199383.159402 ( 0.008023)| [<ffffffff81054aa1>] ? process_one_work+0x35e/0x35e 2199383.163097 ( 0.003695)| [<ffffffff810599c6>] kthread+0xc8/0xd2 2199383.167476 ( 0.004379)| [<ffffffff810598fe>] ? kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x5b/0x5b 2199383.176434 ( 0.008958)| [<ffffffff815a8cac>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 2199383.180086 ( 0.003652)| [<ffffffff810598fe>] ? kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x5b/0x5b 2199383.192333 ( 0.012247)| ehci-pci 0000:00:1a.0: EHCI Host Controller -------------------------------------------------------------------->8 The proposed solution was approved by James Smart at Emulex and tested on a UV2 machine with 6144 cores. With the fix, the LPFC module loads with no unwanted effects on the system. Signed-off-by: Ian Mitchell <imitchell@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com> Suggested-by: Robert Elliot <elliott@hp.com> [james.smart: resolve unused variable warning] Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@avagotech.com> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Odin.com>
amery
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 17, 2016
The kerneldoc for request_firmware_nowait() says that it may call the provided cont() callback with @fw == NULL, if the firmware request fails. However, this is not the case when called with an empty string (""). This case is short-circuited by the 'name[0] == '\0'' check introduced in commit 471b095 ("firmware_class: make sure fw requests contain a name"), so _request_firmware() never gets to set the fw to NULL. Noticed while using the new 'trigger_async_request' testing hook: # printf '\x00' > /sys/devices/virtual/misc/test_firmware/trigger_async_request [10553.726178] test_firmware: loading '' [10553.729859] test_firmware: loaded: 995209091 # printf '\x00' > /sys/devices/virtual/misc/test_firmware/trigger_async_request [10733.676184] test_firmware: loading '' [10733.679855] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000004 [10733.687951] pgd = ec188000 [10733.690655] [00000004] *pgd=00000000 [10733.694240] Internal error: Oops: 5 [#1] SMP ARM [10733.698847] Modules linked in: btmrvl_sdio btmrvl bluetooth sbs_battery nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_filter ip6_tables asix usbnet mwifiex_sdio mwifiex cfg80211 jitterentropy_rng drbg joydev snd_seq_midi snd_seq_midi_event snd_rawmidi snd_seq snd_seq_device ppp_async ppp_generic slhc tun [10733.725670] CPU: 0 PID: 6600 Comm: bash Not tainted 4.4.0-rc4-00351-g63d0877 #178 [10733.733137] Hardware name: Rockchip (Device Tree) [10733.737831] task: ed24f6c0 ti: ee322000 task.ti: ee322000 [10733.743222] PC is at do_raw_spin_lock+0x18/0x1a0 [10733.747831] LR is at _raw_spin_lock+0x18/0x1c [10733.752180] pc : [<c00653a0>] lr : [<c054c204>] psr: a00d0013 [10733.752180] sp : ee323df8 ip : ee323e20 fp : ee323e1c [10733.763634] r10: 00000051 r9 : b6f18000 r8 : ee323f80 [10733.768847] r7 : c089cebc r6 : 00000001 r5 : 00000000 r4 : ec0e6000 [10733.775360] r3 : dead4ead r2 : c06bd140 r1 : eef913b4 r0 : 00000000 [10733.781874] Flags: NzCv IRQs on FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment none [10733.788995] Control: 10c5387d Table: 2c18806a DAC: 00000051 [10733.794728] Process bash (pid: 6600, stack limit = 0xee322218) [10733.800549] Stack: (0xee323df8 to 0xee324000) [10733.804896] 3de0: ec0e6000 00000000 [10733.813059] 3e00: 00000001 c089cebc ee323f80 b6f18000 ee323e2c ee323e20 c054c204 c0065394 [10733.821221] 3e20: ee323e44 ee323e30 c02fec60 c054c1f8 ec0e7ec0 ec3fcfc0 ee323e5c ee323e48 [10733.829384] 3e40: c02fed08 c02fec48 c07dbf74 eeb05a00 ee323e8c ee323e60 c0253828 c02fecac [10733.837547] 3e60: 00000001 c0116950 ee323eac ee323e78 00000001 ec3fce00 ed2d9700 ed2d970c [10733.845710] 3e80: ee323e9c ee323e90 c02e873c c02537d4 ee323eac ee323ea0 c017bd40 c02e8720 [10733.853873] 3ea0: ee323ee4 ee323eb0 c017b250 c017bd00 00000000 00000000 f3e47a54 ec128b00 [10733.862035] 3ec0: c017b10c ee323f80 00000001 c000f504 ee322000 00000000 ee323f4c ee323ee8 [10733.870197] 3ee0: c011b71c c017b118 ee323fb0 c011bc90 becfa8d9 00000001 ec128b00 00000001 [10733.878359] 3f00: b6f18000 ee323f80 ee323f4c ee323f18 c011bc90 c0063950 ee323f3c ee323f28 [10733.886522] 3f20: c0063950 c0549138 00000001 ec128b00 00000001 ec128b00 b6f18000 ee323f80 [10733.894684] 3f40: ee323f7c ee323f50 c011bed8 c011b6ec c0135fb8 c0135f24 ec128b00 ec128b00 [10733.902847] 3f60: 00000001 b6f18000 c000f504 ee322000 ee323fa4 ee323f80 c011c664 c011be24 [10733.911009] 3f80: 00000000 00000000 00000001 b6f18000 b6e79be0 00000004 00000000 ee323fa8 [10733.919172] 3fa0: c000f340 c011c618 00000001 b6f18000 00000001 b6f18000 00000001 00000000 [10733.927334] 3fc0: 00000001 b6f18000 b6e79be0 00000004 00000001 00000001 8068a3f1 b6e79c84 [10733.935496] 3fe0: 00000000 becfa7dc b6de194d b6e20246 400d0030 00000001 7a4536e8 49bda390 [10733.943664] [<c00653a0>] (do_raw_spin_lock) from [<c054c204>] (_raw_spin_lock+0x18/0x1c) [10733.951743] [<c054c204>] (_raw_spin_lock) from [<c02fec60>] (fw_free_buf+0x24/0x64) [10733.959388] [<c02fec60>] (fw_free_buf) from [<c02fed08>] (release_firmware+0x68/0x74) [10733.967207] [<c02fed08>] (release_firmware) from [<c0253828>] (trigger_async_request_store+0x60/0x124) [10733.976501] [<c0253828>] (trigger_async_request_store) from [<c02e873c>] (dev_attr_store+0x28/0x34) [10733.985533] [<c02e873c>] (dev_attr_store) from [<c017bd40>] (sysfs_kf_write+0x4c/0x58) [10733.993437] [<c017bd40>] (sysfs_kf_write) from [<c017b250>] (kernfs_fop_write+0x144/0x1a8) [10734.001689] [<c017b250>] (kernfs_fop_write) from [<c011b71c>] (__vfs_write+0x3c/0xe4) After this patch: # printf '\x00' > /sys/devices/virtual/misc/test_firmware/trigger_async_request [ 32.126322] test_firmware: loading '' [ 32.129995] test_firmware: failed to async load firmware -bash: printf: write error: No such device Fixes: 471b095 ("firmware_class: make sure fw requests contain a name") Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> Acked-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
repojohnray
pushed a commit
to repojohnray/linux-sunxi-4.7.y
that referenced
this issue
May 14, 2021
[ Upstream commit 0f20615 ] Fix BPF_CORE_READ_BITFIELD() macro used for reading CO-RE-relocatable bitfields. Missing breaks in a switch caused 8-byte reads always. This can confuse libbpf because it does strict checks that memory load size corresponds to the original size of the field, which in this case quite often would be wrong. After fixing that, we run into another problem, which quite subtle, so worth documenting here. The issue is in Clang optimization and CO-RE relocation interactions. Without that asm volatile construct (also known as barrier_var()), Clang will re-order BYTE_OFFSET and BYTE_SIZE relocations and will apply BYTE_OFFSET 4 times for each switch case arm. This will result in the same error from libbpf about mismatch of memory load size and original field size. I.e., if we were reading u32, we'd still have *(u8 *), *(u16 *), *(u32 *), and *(u64 *) memory loads, three of which will fail. Using barrier_var() forces Clang to apply BYTE_OFFSET relocation first (and once) to calculate p, after which value of p is used without relocation in each of switch case arms, doing appropiately-sized memory load. Here's the list of relevant relocations and pieces of generated BPF code before and after this patch for test_core_reloc_bitfields_direct selftests. BEFORE ===== linux-sunxi#45: core_reloc: insn linux-sunxi#160 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 linux-sunxi#46: core_reloc: insn linux-sunxi#167 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 linux-sunxi#47: core_reloc: insn linux-sunxi#174 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 linux-sunxi#48: core_reloc: insn linux-sunxi#178 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 linux-sunxi#49: core_reloc: insn linux-sunxi#182 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 157: 18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll 159: 7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1 160: b7 02 00 00 04 00 00 00 r2 = 4 ; BYTE_SIZE relocation here ^^^ 161: 66 02 07 00 03 00 00 00 if w2 s> 3 goto +7 <LBB0_63> 162: 16 02 0d 00 01 00 00 00 if w2 == 1 goto +13 <LBB0_65> 163: 16 02 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w2 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66> 164: 05 00 12 00 00 00 00 00 goto +18 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000528 <LBB0_66>: 165: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 167: 69 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 168: 05 00 0e 00 00 00 00 00 goto +14 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000548 <LBB0_63>: 169: 16 02 0a 00 04 00 00 00 if w2 == 4 goto +10 <LBB0_67> 170: 16 02 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w2 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68> 171: 05 00 0b 00 00 00 00 00 goto +11 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000560 <LBB0_68>: 172: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 174: 79 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 175: 05 00 07 00 00 00 00 00 goto +7 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000580 <LBB0_65>: 176: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 178: 71 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 179: 05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69> 00000000000005a0 <LBB0_67>: 180: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 182: 61 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ RIGHT size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 00000000000005b8 <LBB0_69>: 183: 67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32 184: b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 185: 16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71> 186: c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32 187: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72> 00000000000005e0 <LBB0_71>: 188: 77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 32 AFTER ===== linux-sunxi#30: core_reloc: insn linux-sunxi#132 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 linux-sunxi#31: core_reloc: insn linux-sunxi#134 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 129: 18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll 131: 7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1 132: b7 01 00 00 08 00 00 00 r1 = 8 ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here ^^^ ; no size check for non-memory dereferencing instructions 133: 0f 12 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 += r1 134: b7 03 00 00 04 00 00 00 r3 = 4 ; BYTE_SIZE relocation here ^^^ 135: 66 03 05 00 03 00 00 00 if w3 s> 3 goto +5 <LBB0_63> 136: 16 03 09 00 01 00 00 00 if w3 == 1 goto +9 <LBB0_65> 137: 16 03 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w3 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66> 138: 05 00 0a 00 00 00 00 00 goto +10 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000458 <LBB0_66>: 139: 69 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 140: 05 00 08 00 00 00 00 00 goto +8 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000468 <LBB0_63>: 141: 16 03 06 00 04 00 00 00 if w3 == 4 goto +6 <LBB0_67> 142: 16 03 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w3 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68> 143: 05 00 05 00 00 00 00 00 goto +5 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000480 <LBB0_68>: 144: 79 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 145: 05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000490 <LBB0_65>: 146: 71 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 147: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_69> 00000000000004a0 <LBB0_67>: 148: 61 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 00000000000004a8 <LBB0_69>: 149: 67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32 150: b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 151: 16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71> 152: c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32 153: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72> 00000000000004d0 <LBB0_71>: 154: 77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 323 Fixes: ee26dad ("libbpf: Add support for relocatable bitfields") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210426192949.416837-4-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
repojohnray
pushed a commit
to repojohnray/linux-sunxi-4.7.y
that referenced
this issue
May 18, 2021
[ Upstream commit 0f20615 ] Fix BPF_CORE_READ_BITFIELD() macro used for reading CO-RE-relocatable bitfields. Missing breaks in a switch caused 8-byte reads always. This can confuse libbpf because it does strict checks that memory load size corresponds to the original size of the field, which in this case quite often would be wrong. After fixing that, we run into another problem, which quite subtle, so worth documenting here. The issue is in Clang optimization and CO-RE relocation interactions. Without that asm volatile construct (also known as barrier_var()), Clang will re-order BYTE_OFFSET and BYTE_SIZE relocations and will apply BYTE_OFFSET 4 times for each switch case arm. This will result in the same error from libbpf about mismatch of memory load size and original field size. I.e., if we were reading u32, we'd still have *(u8 *), *(u16 *), *(u32 *), and *(u64 *) memory loads, three of which will fail. Using barrier_var() forces Clang to apply BYTE_OFFSET relocation first (and once) to calculate p, after which value of p is used without relocation in each of switch case arms, doing appropiately-sized memory load. Here's the list of relevant relocations and pieces of generated BPF code before and after this patch for test_core_reloc_bitfields_direct selftests. BEFORE ===== linux-sunxi#45: core_reloc: insn linux-sunxi#160 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 linux-sunxi#46: core_reloc: insn linux-sunxi#167 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 linux-sunxi#47: core_reloc: insn linux-sunxi#174 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 linux-sunxi#48: core_reloc: insn linux-sunxi#178 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 linux-sunxi#49: core_reloc: insn linux-sunxi#182 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 157: 18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll 159: 7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1 160: b7 02 00 00 04 00 00 00 r2 = 4 ; BYTE_SIZE relocation here ^^^ 161: 66 02 07 00 03 00 00 00 if w2 s> 3 goto +7 <LBB0_63> 162: 16 02 0d 00 01 00 00 00 if w2 == 1 goto +13 <LBB0_65> 163: 16 02 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w2 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66> 164: 05 00 12 00 00 00 00 00 goto +18 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000528 <LBB0_66>: 165: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 167: 69 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 168: 05 00 0e 00 00 00 00 00 goto +14 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000548 <LBB0_63>: 169: 16 02 0a 00 04 00 00 00 if w2 == 4 goto +10 <LBB0_67> 170: 16 02 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w2 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68> 171: 05 00 0b 00 00 00 00 00 goto +11 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000560 <LBB0_68>: 172: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 174: 79 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 175: 05 00 07 00 00 00 00 00 goto +7 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000580 <LBB0_65>: 176: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 178: 71 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ WRONG size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 179: 05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69> 00000000000005a0 <LBB0_67>: 180: 18 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = 0 ll 182: 61 11 08 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 8) ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here w/ RIGHT size ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 00000000000005b8 <LBB0_69>: 183: 67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32 184: b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 185: 16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71> 186: c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32 187: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72> 00000000000005e0 <LBB0_71>: 188: 77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 32 AFTER ===== linux-sunxi#30: core_reloc: insn linux-sunxi#132 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_off --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 linux-sunxi#31: core_reloc: insn linux-sunxi#134 --> [5] + 0:5: byte_sz --> struct core_reloc_bitfields.u32 129: 18 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 ll 131: 7b 12 20 01 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r2 + 288) = r1 132: b7 01 00 00 08 00 00 00 r1 = 8 ; BYTE_OFFSET relo here ^^^ ; no size check for non-memory dereferencing instructions 133: 0f 12 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 += r1 134: b7 03 00 00 04 00 00 00 r3 = 4 ; BYTE_SIZE relocation here ^^^ 135: 66 03 05 00 03 00 00 00 if w3 s> 3 goto +5 <LBB0_63> 136: 16 03 09 00 01 00 00 00 if w3 == 1 goto +9 <LBB0_65> 137: 16 03 01 00 02 00 00 00 if w3 == 2 goto +1 <LBB0_66> 138: 05 00 0a 00 00 00 00 00 goto +10 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000458 <LBB0_66>: 139: 69 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u16 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 140: 05 00 08 00 00 00 00 00 goto +8 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000468 <LBB0_63>: 141: 16 03 06 00 04 00 00 00 if w3 == 4 goto +6 <LBB0_67> 142: 16 03 01 00 08 00 00 00 if w3 == 8 goto +1 <LBB0_68> 143: 05 00 05 00 00 00 00 00 goto +5 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000480 <LBB0_68>: 144: 79 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 145: 05 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 goto +3 <LBB0_69> 0000000000000490 <LBB0_65>: 146: 71 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u8 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 147: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_69> 00000000000004a0 <LBB0_67>: 148: 61 21 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u32 *)(r2 + 0) ; NO CO-RE relocation here ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 00000000000004a8 <LBB0_69>: 149: 67 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 <<= 32 150: b7 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 r2 = 0 151: 16 02 02 00 00 00 00 00 if w2 == 0 goto +2 <LBB0_71> 152: c7 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 s>>= 32 153: 05 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 goto +1 <LBB0_72> 00000000000004d0 <LBB0_71>: 154: 77 01 00 00 20 00 00 00 r1 >>= 323 Fixes: ee26dad ("libbpf: Add support for relocatable bitfields") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210426192949.416837-4-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
For the A13, it was sufficient to remove IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING and multi touch from ft5x_ts source. For A20 (running on an unlisted tablet, screen resolution: 1024x600 ) this doesn't work completely. The touch works but the calibration is all haywire and only 2/3 of the screen works. I don't really know if it is because if the screen resolution or something else.
I did a small workaround and kernel now detects the touchscreen as a touch PAD... like the one found on laptops. I can drag the mouse around and click and use the keyboard just like I'm using a laptop's touch pad.
The workaround is very simple, just replace BTN_TOUCH in the ft5x_ts.c with BTN_TOOL_FINGER. The "why and how" of this workaround can be found here:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/input/event-codes.txt
Can someone tell me about the real problem and the correct solution?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: