MAKE FILE ERROR #272
Comments
|
That doesn't look like a sunxi kernel build to me. Please report your issue to the correct project. |
wens
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 8, 2017
split __bpf_prog_run() interpreter into stack allocation and execution parts. The code section shrinks which helps interpreter performance in some cases. text data bss dec hex filename 26350 10328 624 37302 91b6 kernel/bpf/core.o.before 25777 10328 624 36729 8f79 kernel/bpf/core.o.after Very short programs got slower (due to extra function call): Before: test_bpf: #89 ALU64_ADD_K: 1 + 2 = 3 jited:0 7 PASS test_bpf: #90 ALU64_ADD_K: 3 + 0 = 3 jited:0 8 PASS test_bpf: #91 ALU64_ADD_K: 1 + 2147483646 = 2147483647 jited:0 7 PASS test_bpf: #92 ALU64_ADD_K: 4294967294 + 2 = 4294967296 jited:0 11 PASS test_bpf: #93 ALU64_ADD_K: 2147483646 + -2147483647 = -1 jited:0 7 PASS After: test_bpf: #89 ALU64_ADD_K: 1 + 2 = 3 jited:0 11 PASS test_bpf: #90 ALU64_ADD_K: 3 + 0 = 3 jited:0 11 PASS test_bpf: #91 ALU64_ADD_K: 1 + 2147483646 = 2147483647 jited:0 11 PASS test_bpf: #92 ALU64_ADD_K: 4294967294 + 2 = 4294967296 jited:0 14 PASS test_bpf: #93 ALU64_ADD_K: 2147483646 + -2147483647 = -1 jited:0 10 PASS Longer programs got faster: Before: test_bpf: #266 BPF_MAXINSNS: Ctx heavy transformations jited:0 20286 20513 PASS test_bpf: #267 BPF_MAXINSNS: Call heavy transformations jited:0 31853 31768 PASS test_bpf: #268 BPF_MAXINSNS: Jump heavy test jited:0 9815 PASS test_bpf: #269 BPF_MAXINSNS: Very long jump backwards jited:0 6 PASS test_bpf: #270 BPF_MAXINSNS: Edge hopping nuthouse jited:0 13959 PASS test_bpf: #271 BPF_MAXINSNS: Jump, gap, jump, ... jited:0 210 PASS test_bpf: #272 BPF_MAXINSNS: ld_abs+get_processor_id jited:0 21724 PASS test_bpf: #273 BPF_MAXINSNS: ld_abs+vlan_push/pop jited:0 19118 PASS After: test_bpf: #266 BPF_MAXINSNS: Ctx heavy transformations jited:0 19008 18827 PASS test_bpf: #267 BPF_MAXINSNS: Call heavy transformations jited:0 29238 28450 PASS test_bpf: #268 BPF_MAXINSNS: Jump heavy test jited:0 9485 PASS test_bpf: #269 BPF_MAXINSNS: Very long jump backwards jited:0 12 PASS test_bpf: #270 BPF_MAXINSNS: Edge hopping nuthouse jited:0 13257 PASS test_bpf: #271 BPF_MAXINSNS: Jump, gap, jump, ... jited:0 213 PASS test_bpf: #272 BPF_MAXINSNS: ld_abs+get_processor_id jited:0 19389 PASS test_bpf: #273 BPF_MAXINSNS: ld_abs+vlan_push/pop jited:0 19583 PASS For real world production programs the difference is noise. This patch is first step towards reducing interpreter stack consumption. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
amery
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 24, 2018
I recently noticed a crash on arm64 when feeding a bogus index into BPF tail call helper. The crash would not occur when the interpreter is used, but only in case of JIT. Output looks as follows: [ 347.007486] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address fffb850e96492510 [...] [ 347.043065] [fffb850e96492510] address between user and kernel address ranges [ 347.050205] Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] SMP [...] [ 347.190829] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000 [ 347.196128] x11: fffc047ebe782800 x10: ffff808fd7d0fd10 [ 347.201427] x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : 0000000000000000 [ 347.206726] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 001c991738000000 [ 347.212025] x5 : 0000000000000018 x4 : 000000000000ba5a [ 347.217325] x3 : 00000000000329c4 x2 : ffff808fd7cf0500 [ 347.222625] x1 : ffff808fd7d0fc00 x0 : ffff808fd7cf0500 [ 347.227926] Process test_verifier (pid: 4548, stack limit = 0x000000007467fa61) [ 347.235221] Call trace: [ 347.237656] 0xffff000002f3a4fc [ 347.240784] bpf_test_run+0x78/0xf8 [ 347.244260] bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x148/0x230 [ 347.248694] SyS_bpf+0x77c/0x1110 [ 347.251999] el0_svc_naked+0x30/0x34 [ 347.255564] Code: 9100075a d280220a 8b0a002a d37df04b (f86b694b) [...] In this case the index used in BPF r3 is the same as in r1 at the time of the call, meaning we fed a pointer as index; here, it had the value 0xffff808fd7cf0500 which sits in x2. While I found tail calls to be working in general (also for hitting the error cases), I noticed the following in the code emission: # bpftool p d j i 988 [...] 38: ldr w10, [x1,x10] 3c: cmp w2, w10 40: b.ge 0x000000000000007c <-- signed cmp 44: mov x10, #0x20 // #32 48: cmp x26, x10 4c: b.gt 0x000000000000007c 50: add x26, x26, #0x1 54: mov x10, #0x110 // #272 58: add x10, x1, x10 5c: lsl x11, x2, #3 60: ldr x11, [x10,x11] <-- faulting insn (f86b694b) 64: cbz x11, 0x000000000000007c [...] Meaning, the tests passed because commit ddb5599 ("arm64: bpf: implement bpf_tail_call() helper") was using signed compares instead of unsigned which as a result had the test wrongly passing. Change this but also the tail call count test both into unsigned and cap the index as u32. Latter we did as well in 90caccd ("bpf: fix bpf_tail_call() x64 JIT") and is needed in addition here, too. Tested on HiSilicon Hi1616. Result after patch: # bpftool p d j i 268 [...] 38: ldr w10, [x1,x10] 3c: add w2, w2, #0x0 40: cmp w2, w10 44: b.cs 0x0000000000000080 48: mov x10, #0x20 // #32 4c: cmp x26, x10 50: b.hi 0x0000000000000080 54: add x26, x26, #0x1 58: mov x10, #0x110 // #272 5c: add x10, x1, x10 60: lsl x11, x2, #3 64: ldr x11, [x10,x11] 68: cbz x11, 0x0000000000000080 [...] Fixes: ddb5599 ("arm64: bpf: implement bpf_tail_call() helper") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
CC user/module.c
CC user/wiopkd.c
AR build/httpd_app.a
GEN ldscript_memspecific.ld
LD build/httpd.out
/home/sarfaraj/esp-open-sdk/xtensa-lx106-elf/lib/gcc/xtensa-lx106-elf/4.8.5/../../../../xtensa-lx106-elf/bin/ld:ldscript_memspecific.ld:1: warning: redeclaration of memory region irom0_0_seg' /home/sarfaraj/esp-open-sdk/xtensa-lx106-elf/lib/gcc/xtensa-lx106-elf/4.8.5/../../../../xtensa-lx106-elf/bin/ld: build/httpd.out section.text' will not fit in region `iram1_0_seg'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Makefile.combined:22: recipe for target 'build/httpd.out' failed
make: *** [build/httpd.out] Error 1
how can i remove this error i am installed latest toolchain and SDK .could you tell me how remove warning treat as error ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: