Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for managing pool members #264
Add support for managing pool members #264
Changes from all commits
df05f06
63eb18c
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Question: Should we consider removing the PV unsafe? Currently the code will remove the PV from the VG even with the safe mode on. This isn't a destructive operation, but I am also removing the PV from the disk after that and that might be potentially dangerous. And it also might not be user friendly to remove the PV just because user specified incomplete
disks
by accident.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In my opinion, it makes sense to require storage_safe_mode = false to remove PV's from a VG. The storage_safe_mode description in the README states that "When true (the default), an error will occur instead of automatically removing existing devices and/or formatting.", and it seems that this operation would fall under "removing existing devices".
Does the role fail if the user tries to remove a PV from a VG and the PV has data on it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, I'll change the code to require safe mode to be turned off for this operation.
If there is enough free space in the VG it will run
pvmove
to move the LV to an empty PV but it will return error if there isn't enough free space.