Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes for bugs found during testing of 'missing parameters' changeset #64

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jun 12, 2020

Conversation

dwlehman
Copy link
Collaborator

@dwlehman dwlehman commented Nov 5, 2019

NOTE: This will need to be rebased once the safe_mode changes are merged.

Fix key for partition pool...
This leads to a failure (crash?) any time a pool of type 'partition' is present.

Don't unmount anything if only...
This one is pretty self-explanatory.

Add proper checking of specified disk...
We already validate the supplied value of disks for all pools, but not for disk volumes.

Fix passing of fs create options...
We were incorrectly passing user-specified mkfs arguments to blivet, causing them to be ignored.

Fail on request to resize unresizable...
We should not silently fail if the user requests a resize of a non-resizable volume.

Remove partitions etc as needed...
This is sort of a special-case for disk volumes, but it could be needed for other types as well.

Fail w/ error if mount specified...
Error out early if the user specifies mounting of a non-mountable formatting type.

Add a default empty volume list to...
This solves current crashes when a pool is defined with no volumes list.

Copy link
Member

@tyll tyll left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All the commits except for the one with the extra comments look good to me.

def _look_up_device(self):
super(BlivetDiskVolume, self)._look_up_device()
if not self._get_device_id():
# FAIL: no disks specified for volume
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The comment can be removed, it contains the same text as the exception in the next line

raise BlivetAnsibleError("volume disks must be specified as a list")

if self._device is None:
# FAIL: failed to find the disk
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The comment can be removed, it contains the same text as the exception in the next line

super(BlivetDiskVolume, self)._look_up_device()
if not self._get_device_id():
# FAIL: no disks specified for volume
raise BlivetAnsibleError("no disks specified for volume '%s'" % self._volume['name']) # sure about this one?
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The comment at the end of this line is irritating. Is there an issue that should be tracked or can it be removed?

@pcahyna
Copy link
Member

pcahyna commented Jan 13, 2020

@dwlehman this is ready to be merged, right?

@pcahyna
Copy link
Member

pcahyna commented Jan 13, 2020

Do you please have tests for those problems?

@pcahyna
Copy link
Member

pcahyna commented Jan 13, 2020

I suppose the test disabled in 136e41d can be one of them

@pcahyna
Copy link
Member

pcahyna commented Jan 13, 2020

maybe this : #43 (comment) is another instance?

@pcahyna pcahyna mentioned this pull request Jan 14, 2020
@@ -209,6 +209,8 @@ def _resize(self):
raise BlivetAnsibleError("volume '%s' cannot be resized from %s to %s: %s" % (self._device.name,
self._device.size,
size, str(e)))
elif size and self._device.size != size and not self._device.resizable:
raise BlivetAnsibleError("volume '%s' cannot be resized from %s to %s" % (self._device.name, self._device.size, size))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it intended that the role fails in this case already in the "get required packages" task, before the actual resizing attempt?

@pcahyna
Copy link
Member

pcahyna commented Jun 12, 2020

merging - but tests for bugs that it fixes are missing and will need to be added separately.

@pcahyna pcahyna merged commit 69fb94a into linux-system-roles:master Jun 12, 2020
@pcahyna
Copy link
Member

pcahyna commented Jun 12, 2020

I reverted master, this change breaks LUKS.

@pcahyna
Copy link
Member

pcahyna commented Jul 3, 2020

Note: the rebased version is missing some commits, but that's because they are already in master. Add proper checking of specified disk (06b60aa) is part of ab7389d (Add flag to prevent implicit removal of existing device/fs.)

pcahyna added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants