Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

x230-htop-verification: coreboot CBFS_SIZE changed to 0x710000 #756

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 28, 2020
Merged

x230-htop-verification: coreboot CBFS_SIZE changed to 0x710000 #756

merged 1 commit into from Jun 28, 2020

Conversation

tlaurion
Copy link
Collaborator

@tlaurion tlaurion mentioned this pull request Jun 20, 2020
Merged
2 tasks
@lsafd lsafd mentioned this pull request Jun 23, 2020
Closed
@alex-nitrokey
Copy link
Contributor

alex-nitrokey commented Jun 24, 2020 •
edited

This is already included in #748 in 3424317 and can be merged there as soon it is ready (should be later this day).

Or do you want to merge this to master and I merge it in my PR instead?

@alex-nitrokey alex-nitrokey mentioned this pull request Jun 24, 2020
Merged
2 tasks
@tlaurion
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@alex-nitrokey : some users had weird behavior. Will test this change with others and reply back

@tlaurion
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This fix alone is tested and works and will be merge with #748 tested currently with other Nitrokey PRs

@tlaurion tlaurion closed this Jun 28, 2020
@tlaurion tlaurion reopened this Jun 28, 2020
@tlaurion
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tlaurion commented Jun 28, 2020 •
edited

#748 is not mergeable as it is now since not reproducible. Merging this one so that x230-hotp-verification board can work again without resulting into #737

@tlaurion tlaurion merged commit 8dc5b76 into linuxboot:master Jun 28, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@tlaurion @alex-nitrokey