You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I caught a change to the unit of feed rates from [mm/min] to [mm/m] while updating the translations in 184084c
committed by @snowgoer540 .
The SI symbol for Minute is indeed "min", see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minute. Acceptable for me would be [mm/60s] should the minute be frowned upon, but [mm/m] == [1/1000] if picked up by a bad-spirited journalist or decision maker anywhere is bad for the project.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thank you for the heads up; I pushed a fix for this and will mark this closed.
I would be remiss if I didn't point out that the Wikipedia article contradicts itself: "Although not a unit in the International System of Units (SI), the minute is accepted for use in the SI. The SI symbol for minutes is min (without a dot)." It should say something like: "The accepted non-SI symbol for minutes is min (without a dot)." It would also be helpful if it pointed out that the accepted base SI unit is s for seconds.
Hello,
I caught a change to the unit of feed rates from [mm/min] to [mm/m] while updating the translations in 184084c
committed by @snowgoer540 .
The SI symbol for Minute is indeed "min", see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minute. Acceptable for me would be [mm/60s] should the minute be frowned upon, but [mm/m] == [1/1000] if picked up by a bad-spirited journalist or decision maker anywhere is bad for the project.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: