Update to phusion base image version 0.11? #11
Comments
This baseimage was developed a long time ago by someone who is no longer interested in maintaining it. A while back I tried to update it to a more recent phusion base but there were a lot of errors. I quickly gave up as linuxserver.io does not have any images based on this so it wasn't worth it. |
I will try and tackle this sometime this month.
…On Wed, Apr 10, 2019, 6:00 AM aptalca ***@***.***> wrote:
This baseimage was developed a long time ago by someone who is no longer
interested in maintaining it. A while back I tried to update it to a more
recent phusion base but there were a lot of errors. I quickly gave up as
linuxserver.io does not have any images based on this so it wasn't worth
it.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#11 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFiQzXOrP82J7u0F3Sj9NdmqPzQFDn0Gks5vfdJBgaJpZM4cmrJW>
.
|
Please submit your wish list now before I get started.
…On Wed, Apr 10, 2019, 6:59 AM Carlos Hernandez ***@***.***> wrote:
I will try and tackle this sometime this month.
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019, 6:00 AM aptalca ***@***.***> wrote:
> This baseimage was developed a long time ago by someone who is no longer
> interested in maintaining it. A while back I tried to update it to a more
> recent phusion base but there were a lot of errors. I quickly gave up as
> linuxserver.io does not have any images based on this so it wasn't worth
> it.
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#11 (comment)>,
> or mute the thread
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFiQzXOrP82J7u0F3Sj9NdmqPzQFDn0Gks5vfdJBgaJpZM4cmrJW>
> .
>
|
I was thinking of using Debian stable. Anyone opposed?
…On Wed, Apr 10, 2019, 7:00 AM Carlos Hernandez ***@***.***> wrote:
Please submit your wish list now before I get started.
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019, 6:59 AM Carlos Hernandez ***@***.***> wrote:
> I will try and tackle this sometime this month.
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019, 6:00 AM aptalca ***@***.***> wrote:
>
>> This baseimage was developed a long time ago by someone who is no longer
>> interested in maintaining it. A while back I tried to update it to a more
>> recent phusion base but there were a lot of errors. I quickly gave up as
>> linuxserver.io does not have any images based on this so it wasn't
>> worth it.
>>
>> —
>> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
>> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
>> <#11 (comment)>,
>> or mute the thread
>> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFiQzXOrP82J7u0F3Sj9NdmqPzQFDn0Gks5vfdJBgaJpZM4cmrJW>
>> .
>>
>
|
Where is the challenge in debian? I say go for alpine 😜 |
Well thank you for suggestions, but I don't have that kind of time to
dedicate to the project. Plus, space and bandwidth are cheap nowadays.
…On Wed, Apr 10, 2019, 7:29 AM saarg ***@***.***> wrote:
Where is the challenge in debian? I say go for alpine 😜
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#11 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFiQze007EjxpddkK2el6etFaf4jHAsMks5vfecwgaJpZM4cmrJW>
.
|
It was just a joke :) |
@hurricanehrndz how about our ubuntu baseimage? It's multi-arch and would be compatible with all of our other downstream images. https://github.com/linuxserver/docker-baseimage-ubuntu/tree/bionic |
Sounds good
…On Wed, Apr 10, 2019, 8:28 AM aptalca ***@***.***> wrote:
@hurricanehrndz <https://github.com/hurricanehrndz> how about our ubuntu
baseimage? It's multi-arch and would be compatible with all of our other
downstream images.
https://github.com/linuxserver/docker-baseimage-ubuntu/tree/bionic
https://hub.docker.com/r/lsiobase/ubuntu (have bionic and xenial tags,
both multi-arch)
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#11 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFiQzUsext9-MRuM0182nsuNV6ZBkf2rks5vffUYgaJpZM4cmrJW>
.
|
For the container I am maintaining at least, Ubuntu (bionic and xenial) both have more updated packages than Debian stable, so I'd vote for the LSio base. |
Started already with ubuntu base.
…On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 4:45 PM xthursdayx ***@***.***> wrote:
@hurricanehrndz <https://github.com/hurricanehrndz> how about our ubuntu
baseimage? It's multi-arch and would be compatible with all of our other
downstream images.
https://github.com/linuxserver/docker-baseimage-ubuntu/tree/bionic
https://hub.docker.com/r/lsiobase/ubuntu (have bionic and xenial tags,
both multi-arch)
For the container I am maintaining at least, Ubuntu (bionic and xenial)
both have more updated packages than Debian stable, so I'd vote for the
LSio base.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#11 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFiQzSk9357bD2L2y9FYqChwIya45JXGks5vfmmFgaJpZM4cmrJW>
.
--
Regards,
Carlos Hernandez
|
lsio of course.
…On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 4:46 PM Carlos Hernandez ***@***.***> wrote:
Started already with ubuntu base.
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 4:45 PM xthursdayx ***@***.***>
wrote:
> @hurricanehrndz <https://github.com/hurricanehrndz> how about our ubuntu
> baseimage? It's multi-arch and would be compatible with all of our other
> downstream images.
>
> https://github.com/linuxserver/docker-baseimage-ubuntu/tree/bionic
> https://hub.docker.com/r/lsiobase/ubuntu (have bionic and xenial tags,
> both multi-arch)
>
> For the container I am maintaining at least, Ubuntu (bionic and xenial)
> both have more updated packages than Debian stable, so I'd vote for the
> LSio base.
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#11 (comment)>,
> or mute the thread
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFiQzSk9357bD2L2y9FYqChwIya45JXGks5vfmmFgaJpZM4cmrJW>
> .
>
--
Regards,
Carlos Hernandez
--
Regards,
Carlos Hernandez
|
Thanks for your work on this @hurricanehrndz ! |
Would it be possible to update this base image to use phusion's version 0.11 base, or at least to make an updated release version? Phusion's v0.11 base images uses Ubuntu base 18.04 rather than 14.04.
If this is possible, then /files/install/install.sh will need to be updated to reflect this:
echo 'deb mirror://mirrors.ubuntu.com/mirrors.txt bionic main universe restricted' > /etc/apt/sources.list echo 'deb mirror://mirrors.ubuntu.com/mirrors.txt bionic-updates main universe restricted' >> /etc/apt/sources.list
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: