fix: P-654 added solana signature check

[higherordertech]

Context

as titles

Labels

Please apply following PR-related labels when appropriate:

• C0-breaking: if your change could break the existing client, e.g. API change, critical logic change
• C1-noteworthy: if your change is non-breaking, but is still worth noticing for the client, e.g. reference code improvement

How (Optional)

Testing Evidences

Please attach any relevant evidences if applicable

Tested via unit test

[linear]

P-654 Missing check branch for `Solana`

[silva-fj]

Do we have a place where we put shared/common code between workers? if not, what's the reason?

[BillyWooo]

Do we have a place where we put shared/common code between workers? if not, what's the reason?

This is under discussion. Check issue P-600 and related ones.

[BillyWooo]

The changes looks good to me. Can you take a look at the CI test failure of one worker?

[Kailai-Wang]

Shall we have ts-test for it (at least happy path)?

[higherordertech]

Shall we have ts-test for it (at least happy path)?

Yes integration tests have been added too.

[Kailai-Wang]

Shall we have ts-test for it (at least happy path)?

Yes integration tests have been added too.

I'm not sure if the test is run in CI though

[Kailai-Wang]

Thanks!