Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[arch][arm64] Fix mmu_unmap issue when FEAT_TTL is implemented #386

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 25, 2023

Conversation

shavitmichael
Copy link
Contributor

Precisely set bits [55:22] of the vaddress in bits [43:0] for the vae1is and vaee1is TLBI commands.

On platforms where FEAT_TLL is implemented, bits [47:44] of the command accept a TTL parameter which can optionally be set to hint the translation table level containing the address being invalidated. Implementations aren't architecturally required to perform the invalidation if the hint is incorrect however. Invalidations may therefore fail with the current implementation if the vaddress has bits set in [58:55].

This is notably an issue on ARM fastmodels which doesn't perform the invalidation when the TTL parameter is incorrect.

Precisely set bits [55:22] of the vaddress in bits [43:0] for the vae1is
and vaee1is TLBI commands.

On platforms where FEAT_TLL is implemented, bits [47:44] of the command
accept a TTL parameter which can optionally be set to hint the
translation table level containing the address being invalidated.
Implementations aren't architecturally required to perform the
invalidation if the hint is incorrect however. Invalidations may
therefore fail with the current implementation if the vaddress has bits
set in [58:55].

This is notably an issue on ARM fastmodels which doesn't perform the
invalidation when the TTL parameter is incorrect.
@shavitmichael
Copy link
Contributor Author

Light ping :) @travisg

@travisg
Copy link
Member

travisg commented Sep 25, 2023

Good catch! Sorry for the delay on this one, I totally missed it in my email spew.

@travisg travisg merged commit 284f83a into littlekernel:master Sep 25, 2023
257 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants