New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
#165 Remove all MatcherOf ctors except last one #223
#165 Remove all MatcherOf ctors except last one #223
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #223 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 98.81% 98.82%
- Complexity 137 139 +2
=========================================
Files 27 27
Lines 338 339 +1
Branches 4 5 +1
=========================================
+ Hits 334 335 +1
Misses 4 4
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
@0crat assign me |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@baudoliver7 a few comments and changes :)
src/test/java/org/llorllale/cactoos/matchers/MatcherOfTest.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
f2bda3c
to
25ad01e
Compare
@victornoel PR updated |
@victornoel Some suggestions have been made |
25ad01e
to
fdd706d
Compare
@baudoliver7 great thx |
@rultor merge |
@victornoel OK, I'll try to merge now. You can check the progress of the merge here |
@baudoliver7 @victornoel Oops, I failed. You can see the full log here (spent 7min)
|
a9aeeb3
to
ebd3445
Compare
@baudoliver7 unfortunately, in cactoos-matchers, rultor is more capricious than in cactoos and doesn't want to merge if there are failed checks. I think if we manage to have tests covering those two lines it should work: https://github.com/llorllale/cactoos-matchers/pull/223/checks?check_run_id=1754033840 |
@victornoel Ok, I check |
aff8dc6
to
d36f89d
Compare
d36f89d
to
9b0f9fa
Compare
@victornoel Test coverage is now quite good :) |
@victornoel Could you try to merge once again ? Thx :) |
@baudoliver7 yep thx :) |
@rultor merge |
@victornoel OK, I'll try to merge now. You can check the progress of the merge here |
@victornoel Done! FYI, the full log is here (took me 7min) |
Code review was too long (9 days), architects (@victornoel) were penalized, see §55 |
#165