Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
[DAGCombiner] Use getVectorElementCount inside visitINSERT_SUBVECTOR
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
This avoids TypeSize-/ElementCount-related warnings.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92747
  • Loading branch information
Joe Ellis committed Jan 11, 2021
1 parent 5522547 commit 0073582
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 35 additions and 5 deletions.
12 changes: 7 additions & 5 deletions llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
Expand Up @@ -21008,8 +21008,8 @@ SDValue DAGCombiner::visitINSERT_SUBVECTOR(SDNode *N) {
if (N0.isUndef() && N1.getOpcode() == ISD::BITCAST &&
N1.getOperand(0).getOpcode() == ISD::EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR &&
N1.getOperand(0).getOperand(1) == N2 &&
N1.getOperand(0).getOperand(0).getValueType().getVectorNumElements() ==
VT.getVectorNumElements() &&
N1.getOperand(0).getOperand(0).getValueType().getVectorElementCount() ==
VT.getVectorElementCount() &&
N1.getOperand(0).getOperand(0).getValueType().getSizeInBits() ==
VT.getSizeInBits()) {
return DAG.getBitcast(VT, N1.getOperand(0).getOperand(0));
Expand All @@ -21026,7 +21026,7 @@ SDValue DAGCombiner::visitINSERT_SUBVECTOR(SDNode *N) {
EVT CN1VT = CN1.getValueType();
if (CN0VT.isVector() && CN1VT.isVector() &&
CN0VT.getVectorElementType() == CN1VT.getVectorElementType() &&
CN0VT.getVectorNumElements() == VT.getVectorNumElements()) {
CN0VT.getVectorElementCount() == VT.getVectorElementCount()) {
SDValue NewINSERT = DAG.getNode(ISD::INSERT_SUBVECTOR, SDLoc(N),
CN0.getValueType(), CN0, CN1, N2);
return DAG.getBitcast(VT, NewINSERT);
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -21107,8 +21107,10 @@ SDValue DAGCombiner::visitINSERT_SUBVECTOR(SDNode *N) {
// If the input vector is a concatenation, and the insert replaces
// one of the pieces, we can optimize into a single concat_vectors.
if (N0.getOpcode() == ISD::CONCAT_VECTORS && N0.hasOneUse() &&
N0.getOperand(0).getValueType() == N1.getValueType()) {
unsigned Factor = N1.getValueType().getVectorNumElements();
N0.getOperand(0).getValueType() == N1.getValueType() &&
N0.getOperand(0).getValueType().isScalableVector() ==
N1.getValueType().isScalableVector()) {
unsigned Factor = N1.getValueType().getVectorMinNumElements();
SmallVector<SDValue, 8> Ops(N0->op_begin(), N0->op_end());
Ops[InsIdx / Factor] = N1;
return DAG.getNode(ISD::CONCAT_VECTORS, SDLoc(N), VT, Ops);
Expand Down
28 changes: 28 additions & 0 deletions llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/dag-combine-insert-subvector.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
; RUN: llc < %s -o /dev/null 2>&1 | FileCheck --allow-empty %s

; This regression test is defending against a ElementCount warning 'Possible incorrect use of
; EVT::getVectorNumElements() for scalable vector'. This warning appeared in
; DAGCombiner::visitINSERT_SUBVECTOR because of the use of getVectorNumElements() on scalable
; types.

; If this check fails please read test/CodeGen/AArch64/README for instructions on how to resolve it.
; CHECK-NOT: warning:

target triple = "aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu"
attributes #0 = {"target-features"="+sve"}

declare <16 x float> @llvm.experimental.vector.extract.v16f32.nxv4f32(<vscale x 4 x float>, i64)
declare <vscale x 2 x double> @llvm.experimental.vector.insert.nxv2f64.v8f64(<vscale x 2 x double>, <8 x double>, i64)

define <vscale x 2 x double> @reproducer_one(<vscale x 4 x float> %vec_a) #0 {
%a = call <16 x float> @llvm.experimental.vector.extract.v16f32.nxv4f32(<vscale x 4 x float> %vec_a, i64 0)
%b = bitcast <16 x float> %a to <8 x double>
%retval = call <vscale x 2 x double> @llvm.experimental.vector.insert.nxv2f64.v8f64(<vscale x 2 x double> undef, <8 x double> %b, i64 0)
ret <vscale x 2 x double> %retval
}

define <vscale x 2 x double> @reproducer_two(<4 x double> %a, <4 x double> %b) #0 {
%concat = shufflevector <4 x double> %a, <4 x double> %b, <8 x i32> <i32 4, i32 5, i32 6, i32 7, i32 0, i32 1, i32 2, i32 3>
%retval = call <vscale x 2 x double> @llvm.experimental.vector.insert.nxv2f64.v8f64(<vscale x 2 x double> undef, <8 x double> %concat, i64 0)
ret <vscale x 2 x double> %retval
}

0 comments on commit 0073582

Please sign in to comment.