PR42694 Support explicit(bool) in older language modes as an extension.

This needs somewhat careful disambiguation, as C++2a explicit(bool) is a
breaking change. We only enable it in cases where the source construct
could not possibly be anything else.

(cherry picked from commit 45d7080)

clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticParseKinds.td

@@ -33,10 +33,6 @@ def err_asm_goto_cannot_have_output : Error<
 
 let CategoryName = "Parse Issue" in {
 
-def warn_cxx2a_compat_explicit_bool : Warning<
-  "this expression will be parsed as explicit(bool) in C++2a">,
-  InGroup<CXX2aCompat>, DefaultIgnore;
-
 def ext_empty_translation_unit : Extension<
   "ISO C requires a translation unit to contain at least one declaration">,
   InGroup<DiagGroup<"empty-translation-unit">>;
@@ -684,6 +680,15 @@ def err_ms_property_expected_comma_or_rparen : Error<
 def err_ms_property_initializer : Error<
   "property declaration cannot have an in-class initializer">;
 
+def warn_cxx2a_compat_explicit_bool : Warning<
+  "this expression will be parsed as explicit(bool) in C++2a">,
+  InGroup<CXX2aCompat>, DefaultIgnore;
+def warn_cxx17_compat_explicit_bool : Warning<
+  "explicit(bool) is incompatible with C++ standards before C++2a">,
+  InGroup<CXXPre2aCompat>, DefaultIgnore;
+def ext_explicit_bool : ExtWarn<"explicit(bool) is a C++2a extension">,
+  InGroup<CXX2a>;
+
 /// C++ Templates
 def err_expected_template : Error<"expected template">;
 def err_unknown_template_name : Error<

clang/include/clang/Parse/Parser.h

@@ -806,6 +806,16 @@ class Parser : public CodeCompletionHandler {
                                                  bool IsNewScope);
   bool TryAnnotateCXXScopeToken(bool EnteringContext = false);
 
+  bool MightBeCXXScopeToken() {
+    return Tok.is(tok::identifier) || Tok.is(tok::coloncolon) ||
+           (Tok.is(tok::annot_template_id) &&
+            NextToken().is(tok::coloncolon)) ||
+           Tok.is(tok::kw_decltype) || Tok.is(tok::kw___super);
+  }
+  bool TryAnnotateOptionalCXXScopeToken(bool EnteringContext = false) {
+    return MightBeCXXScopeToken() && TryAnnotateCXXScopeToken(EnteringContext);
+  }
+
 private:
   enum AnnotatedNameKind {
     /// Annotation has failed and emitted an error.
@@ -2395,6 +2405,11 @@ class Parser : public CodeCompletionHandler {
   /// rather than a less-than expression.
   TPResult isTemplateArgumentList(unsigned TokensToSkip);
 
+  /// Determine whether an '(' after an 'explicit' keyword is part of a C++20
+  /// 'explicit(bool)' declaration, in earlier language modes where that is an
+  /// extension.
+  TPResult isExplicitBool();
+
   /// Determine whether an identifier has been tentatively declared as a
   /// non-type. Such tentative declarations should not be found to name a type
   /// during a tentative parse, but also should not be annotated as a non-type.

clang/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp

@@ -3617,7 +3617,11 @@ void Parser::ParseDeclarationSpecifiers(DeclSpec &DS,
       ConsumedEnd = ExplicitLoc;
       ConsumeToken(); // kw_explicit
       if (Tok.is(tok::l_paren)) {
-        if (getLangOpts().CPlusPlus2a) {
+        if (getLangOpts().CPlusPlus2a || isExplicitBool() == TPResult::True) {
+          Diag(Tok.getLocation(), getLangOpts().CPlusPlus2a
+                                      ? diag::warn_cxx17_compat_explicit_bool
+                                      : diag::ext_explicit_bool);
+
           ExprResult ExplicitExpr(static_cast<Expr *>(nullptr));
           BalancedDelimiterTracker Tracker(*this, tok::l_paren);
           Tracker.consumeOpen();
@@ -3630,8 +3634,9 @@ void Parser::ParseDeclarationSpecifiers(DeclSpec &DS,
                 Actions.ActOnExplicitBoolSpecifier(ExplicitExpr.get());
           } else
             Tracker.skipToEnd();
-        } else
+        } else {
           Diag(Tok.getLocation(), diag::warn_cxx2a_compat_explicit_bool);
+        }
       }
       isInvalid = DS.setFunctionSpecExplicit(ExplicitLoc, PrevSpec, DiagID,
                                              ExplicitSpec, CloseParenLoc);

clang/lib/Parse/ParseTentative.cpp

@@ -202,9 +202,7 @@ Parser::TPResult Parser::TryConsumeDeclarationSpecifier() {
       }
     }
 
-    if (Tok.isOneOf(tok::identifier, tok::coloncolon, tok::kw_decltype,
-                    tok::annot_template_id) &&
-        TryAnnotateCXXScopeToken())
+    if (TryAnnotateOptionalCXXScopeToken())
       return TPResult::Error;
     if (Tok.is(tok::annot_cxxscope))
       ConsumeAnnotationToken();
@@ -785,9 +783,8 @@ Parser::isCXX11AttributeSpecifier(bool Disambiguate,
 
 Parser::TPResult Parser::TryParsePtrOperatorSeq() {
   while (true) {
-    if (Tok.isOneOf(tok::coloncolon, tok::identifier))
-      if (TryAnnotateCXXScopeToken(true))
-        return TPResult::Error;
+    if (TryAnnotateOptionalCXXScopeToken(true))
+      return TPResult::Error;
 
     if (Tok.isOneOf(tok::star, tok::amp, tok::caret, tok::ampamp) ||
         (Tok.is(tok::annot_cxxscope) && NextToken().is(tok::star))) {
@@ -2137,3 +2134,58 @@ Parser::TPResult Parser::isTemplateArgumentList(unsigned TokensToSkip) {
     return TPResult::Ambiguous;
   return TPResult::False;
 }
+
+/// Determine whether we might be looking at the '(' of a C++20 explicit(bool)
+/// in an earlier language mode.
+Parser::TPResult Parser::isExplicitBool() {
+  assert(Tok.is(tok::l_paren) && "expected to be looking at a '(' token");
+
+  RevertingTentativeParsingAction PA(*this);
+  ConsumeParen();
+
+  // We can only have 'explicit' on a constructor, conversion function, or
+  // deduction guide. The declarator of a deduction guide cannot be
+  // parenthesized, so we know this isn't a deduction guide. So the only
+  // thing we need to check for is some number of parens followed by either
+  // the current class name or 'operator'.
+  while (Tok.is(tok::l_paren))
+    ConsumeParen();
+
+  if (TryAnnotateOptionalCXXScopeToken())
+    return TPResult::Error;
+
+  // Class-scope constructor and conversion function names can't really be
+  // qualified, but we get better diagnostics if we assume they can be.
+  CXXScopeSpec SS;
+  if (Tok.is(tok::annot_cxxscope)) {
+    Actions.RestoreNestedNameSpecifierAnnotation(Tok.getAnnotationValue(),
+                                                 Tok.getAnnotationRange(),
+                                                 SS);
+    ConsumeAnnotationToken();
+  }
+
+  // 'explicit(operator' might be explicit(bool) or the declaration of a
+  // conversion function, but it's probably a conversion function.
+  if (Tok.is(tok::kw_operator))
+    return TPResult::Ambiguous;
+
+  // If this can't be a constructor name, it can only be explicit(bool).
+  if (Tok.isNot(tok::identifier) && Tok.isNot(tok::annot_template_id))
+    return TPResult::True;
+  if (!Actions.isCurrentClassName(Tok.is(tok::identifier)
+                                      ? *Tok.getIdentifierInfo()
+                                      : *takeTemplateIdAnnotation(Tok)->Name,
+                                  getCurScope(), &SS))
+    return TPResult::True;
+  // Formally, we must have a right-paren after the constructor name to match
+  // the grammar for a constructor. But clang permits a parenthesized
+  // constructor declarator, so also allow a constructor declarator to follow
+  // with no ')' token after the constructor name.
+  if (!NextToken().is(tok::r_paren) &&
+      !isConstructorDeclarator(/*Unqualified=*/SS.isEmpty(),
+                               /*DeductionGuide=*/false))
+    return TPResult::True;
+
+  // Might be explicit(bool) or a parenthesized constructor name.
+  return TPResult::Ambiguous;
+}

clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp

@@ -2005,10 +2005,7 @@ bool Parser::TryAnnotateTypeOrScopeTokenAfterScopeSpec(CXXScopeSpec &SS,
 bool Parser::TryAnnotateCXXScopeToken(bool EnteringContext) {
   assert(getLangOpts().CPlusPlus &&
          "Call sites of this function should be guarded by checking for C++");
-  assert((Tok.is(tok::identifier) || Tok.is(tok::coloncolon) ||
-          (Tok.is(tok::annot_template_id) && NextToken().is(tok::coloncolon)) ||
-          Tok.is(tok::kw_decltype) || Tok.is(tok::kw___super)) &&
-         "Cannot be a type or scope token!");
+  assert(MightBeCXXScopeToken() && "Cannot be a type or scope token!");
 
   CXXScopeSpec SS;
   if (ParseOptionalCXXScopeSpecifier(SS, nullptr, EnteringContext))

clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx2a-explicit-bool.cpp

@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++17 -fsyntax-only %s -verify -Wno-c++2a-extensions
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++2a -fsyntax-only %s -verify
 
 template <bool b, auto val> struct enable_ifv {};