[clang] Move tailclipping to bitfield allocation (#87090)

Move bitfield access clipping to bitfield access computation.

clang/lib/CodeGen/CGRecordLayoutBuilder.cpp

@@ -41,10 +41,11 @@ namespace {
 ///   contains enough information to determine where the runs break.  Microsoft
 ///   and Itanium follow different rules and use different codepaths.
 /// * It is desired that, when possible, bitfields use the appropriate iN type
-///   when lowered to llvm types.  For example unsigned x : 24 gets lowered to
+///   when lowered to llvm types. For example unsigned x : 24 gets lowered to
 ///   i24.  This isn't always possible because i24 has storage size of 32 bit
-///   and if it is possible to use that extra byte of padding we must use
-///   [i8 x 3] instead of i24.  The function clipTailPadding does this.
+///   and if it is possible to use that extra byte of padding we must use [i8 x
+///   3] instead of i24. This is computed when accumulating bitfields in
+///   accumulateBitfields.
 ///   C++ examples that require clipping:
 ///   struct { int a : 24; char b; }; // a must be clipped, b goes at offset 3
 ///   struct A { int a : 24; ~A(); }; // a must be clipped because:
@@ -62,11 +63,7 @@ namespace {
 ///   that the tail padding is not used in the complete class.) However,
 ///   because LLVM reads from the complete type it can generate incorrect code
 ///   if we do not clip the tail padding off of the bitfield in the complete
-///   layout.  This introduces a somewhat awkward extra unnecessary clip stage.
-///   The location of the clip is stored internally as a sentinel of type
-///   SCISSOR.  If LLVM were updated to read base types (which it probably
-///   should because locations of things such as VBases are bogus in the llvm
-///   type anyway) then we could eliminate the SCISSOR.
+///   layout.
 /// * Itanium allows nearly empty primary virtual bases.  These bases don't get
 ///   get their own storage because they're laid out as part of another base
 ///   or at the beginning of the structure.  Determining if a VBase actually
@@ -200,9 +197,7 @@ struct CGRecordLowering {
                      const CXXRecordDecl *Query) const;
   void calculateZeroInit();
   CharUnits calculateTailClippingOffset(bool isNonVirtualBaseType) const;
-  /// Lowers bitfield storage types to I8 arrays for bitfields with tail
-  /// padding that is or can potentially be used.
-  void clipTailPadding();
+  void checkBitfieldClipping() const;
   /// Determines if we need a packed llvm struct.
   void determinePacked(bool NVBaseType);
   /// Inserts padding everywhere it's needed.
@@ -305,7 +300,7 @@ void CGRecordLowering::lower(bool NVBaseType) {
   }
   llvm::stable_sort(Members);
   Members.push_back(StorageInfo(Size, getIntNType(8)));
-  clipTailPadding();
+  checkBitfieldClipping();
   determinePacked(NVBaseType);
   insertPadding();
   Members.pop_back();
@@ -531,6 +526,7 @@ CGRecordLowering::accumulateBitFields(bool isNonVirtualBaseType,
   // available padding characters.
   RecordDecl::field_iterator BestEnd = Begin;
   CharUnits BestEndOffset;
+  bool BestClipped; // Whether the representation must be in a byte array.
 
   for (;;) {
     // AtAlignedBoundary is true iff Field is the (potential) start of a new
@@ -593,10 +589,9 @@ CGRecordLowering::accumulateBitFields(bool isNonVirtualBaseType,
         // this is the best seen so far.
         BestEnd = Field;
         BestEndOffset = BeginOffset + AccessSize;
-        if (Types.getCodeGenOpts().FineGrainedBitfieldAccesses)
-          // Fine-grained access, so no merging of spans.
-          InstallBest = true;
-        else if (!BitSizeSinceBegin)
+        // Assume clipped until proven not below.
+        BestClipped = true;
+        if (!BitSizeSinceBegin)
           // A zero-sized initial span -- this will install nothing and reset
           // for another.
           InstallBest = true;
@@ -624,6 +619,12 @@ CGRecordLowering::accumulateBitFields(bool isNonVirtualBaseType,
             // The access unit is not at a naturally aligned offset within the
             // structure.
             InstallBest = true;
+
+          if (InstallBest && BestEnd == Field)
+            // We're installing the first span, whose clipping was presumed
+            // above. Compute it correctly.
+            if (getSize(Type) == AccessSize)
+              BestClipped = false;
         }
 
         if (!InstallBest) {
@@ -656,11 +657,15 @@ CGRecordLowering::accumulateBitFields(bool isNonVirtualBaseType,
             // access unit.
             BestEndOffset = BeginOffset + TypeSize;
             BestEnd = Field;
+            BestClipped = false;
           }
 
           if (Barrier)
             // The next field is a barrier that we cannot merge across.
             InstallBest = true;
+          else if (Types.getCodeGenOpts().FineGrainedBitfieldAccesses)
+            // Fine-grained access, so no merging of spans.
+            InstallBest = true;
           else
             // Otherwise, we're not installing. Update the bit size
             // of the current span to go all the way to LimitOffset, which is
@@ -679,7 +684,17 @@ CGRecordLowering::accumulateBitFields(bool isNonVirtualBaseType,
         // Add the storage member for the access unit to the record. The
         // bitfields get the offset of their storage but come afterward and
         // remain there after a stable sort.
-        llvm::Type *Type = getIntNType(Context.toBits(AccessSize));
+        llvm::Type *Type;
+        if (BestClipped) {
+          assert(getSize(getIntNType(Context.toBits(AccessSize))) >
+                     AccessSize &&
+                 "Clipped access need not be clipped");
+          Type = getByteArrayType(AccessSize);
+        } else {
+          Type = getIntNType(Context.toBits(AccessSize));
+          assert(getSize(Type) == AccessSize &&
+                 "Unclipped access must be clipped");
+        }
         Members.push_back(StorageInfo(BeginOffset, Type));
         for (; Begin != BestEnd; ++Begin)
           if (!Begin->isZeroLengthBitField(Context))
@@ -934,32 +949,21 @@ void CGRecordLowering::calculateZeroInit() {
   }
 }
 
-void CGRecordLowering::clipTailPadding() {
-  std::vector<MemberInfo>::iterator Prior = Members.begin();
-  CharUnits Tail = getSize(Prior->Data);
-  for (std::vector<MemberInfo>::iterator Member = Prior + 1,
-                                         MemberEnd = Members.end();
-       Member != MemberEnd; ++Member) {
+// Verify accumulateBitfields computed the correct storage representations.
+void CGRecordLowering::checkBitfieldClipping() const {
+#ifndef NDEBUG
+  auto Tail = CharUnits::Zero();
+  for (const auto &M : Members) {
     // Only members with data and the scissor can cut into tail padding.
-    if (!Member->Data && Member->Kind != MemberInfo::Scissor)
+    if (!M.Data && M.Kind != MemberInfo::Scissor)
       continue;
-    if (Member->Offset < Tail) {
-      assert(Prior->Kind == MemberInfo::Field &&
-             "Only storage fields have tail padding!");
-      if (!Prior->FD || Prior->FD->isBitField())
-        Prior->Data = getByteArrayType(bitsToCharUnits(llvm::alignTo(
-            cast<llvm::IntegerType>(Prior->Data)->getIntegerBitWidth(), 8)));
-      else {
-        assert(Prior->FD->hasAttr<NoUniqueAddressAttr>() &&
-               "should not have reused this field's tail padding");
-        Prior->Data = getByteArrayType(
-            Context.getTypeInfoDataSizeInChars(Prior->FD->getType()).Width);
-      }
-    }
-    if (Member->Data)
-      Prior = Member;
-    Tail = Prior->Offset + getSize(Prior->Data);
+
+    assert(M.Offset >= Tail && "Bitfield access unit is not clipped");
+    Tail = M.Offset;
+    if (M.Data)
+      Tail += getSize(M.Data);
   }
+#endif
 }
 
 void CGRecordLowering::determinePacked(bool NVBaseType) {

clang/test/CodeGen/bitfield-access-unit.c

@@ -222,6 +222,24 @@ struct G {
 // LAYOUT-DWN32-NEXT: <CGBitFieldInfo Offset:{{[0-9]+}} Size:7 IsSigned:1 StorageSize:8 StorageOffset:4
 // CHECK-NEXT: ]>
 
+struct __attribute__((aligned(8))) H {
+  char a;
+  unsigned b : 24; // on expensive alignment we want this to stay 24
+  unsigned c __attribute__((aligned(8))); // Think 'long long' or lp64 ptr
+} h;
+// CHECK-LABEL: LLVMType:%struct.H =
+// LAYOUT-FLEX-SAME: type <{ i8, i32, [3 x i8], i32, [4 x i8] }>
+// LAYOUT-STRICT-SAME: type { i8, [3 x i8], [4 x i8], i32, [4 x i8] }
+// LAYOUT-DWN32-FLEX-SAME: type <{ i8, i32, [3 x i8], i32, [4 x i8] }>
+// LAYOUT-DWN32-STRICT-SAME: type { i8, [3 x i8], [4 x i8], i32, [4 x i8] }
+// CHECK: BitFields:[
+// LAYOUT-FLEX-NEXT: <CGBitFieldInfo Offset:{{[0-9]+}} Size:24 IsSigned:0 StorageSize:32 StorageOffset:1
+// LAYOUT-STRICT-NEXT: <CGBitFieldInfo Offset:{{[0-9]+}} Size:24 IsSigned:0 StorageSize:24 StorageOffset:1
+
+// LAYOUT-DWN32-FLEX-NEXT: <CGBitFieldInfo Offset:{{[0-9]+}} Size:24 IsSigned:0 StorageSize:32 StorageOffset:1
+// LAYOUT-DWN32-STRICT-NEXT: <CGBitFieldInfo Offset:{{[0-9]+}} Size:24 IsSigned:0 StorageSize:24 StorageOffset:1
+// CHECK-NEXT: ]>
+
 #if _LP64
 struct A64 {
   int a : 16;