Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
[analyzer] ConditionBRVisitor: Unknown condition evaluation support
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Summary:
If the constraint information is not changed between two program states the
analyzer has not learnt new information and made no report. But it is
possible to happen because we have no information at all. The new approach
evaluates the condition to determine if that is the case and let the user
know we just `Assuming...` some value.

Reviewers: NoQ, george.karpenkov

Reviewed By: NoQ

Subscribers: llvm-commits, xazax.hun, baloghadamsoftware, szepet, a.sidorin,
mikhail.ramalho, Szelethus, donat.nagy, dkrupp, gsd, gerazo

Tags: #clang, #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57410

llvm-svn: 356323
  • Loading branch information
Charusso committed Mar 16, 2019
1 parent cf0b4e3 commit 9ea2f90
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 3 changed files with 22 additions and 11 deletions.
19 changes: 12 additions & 7 deletions clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/BugReporterVisitors.cpp
Expand Up @@ -1815,12 +1815,6 @@ std::shared_ptr<PathDiagnosticPiece>
ConditionBRVisitor::VisitNodeImpl(const ExplodedNode *N,
BugReporterContext &BRC, BugReport &BR) {
ProgramPoint progPoint = N->getLocation();
ProgramStateRef CurrentState = N->getState();
ProgramStateRef PreviousState = N->getFirstPred()->getState();

// If the constraint information does not changed there is no assumption.
if (BRC.getStateManager().haveEqualConstraints(CurrentState, PreviousState))
return nullptr;

// If an assumption was made on a branch, it should be caught
// here by looking at the state transition.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1910,6 +1904,18 @@ std::shared_ptr<PathDiagnosticPiece>
ConditionBRVisitor::VisitTrueTest(const Expr *Cond, bool tookTrue,
BugReporterContext &BRC, BugReport &R,
const ExplodedNode *N) {
ProgramStateRef CurrentState = N->getState();
ProgramStateRef PreviousState = N->getFirstPred()->getState();
const LocationContext *LCtx = N->getLocationContext();

// If the constraint information is changed between the current and the
// previous program state we assuming the newly seen constraint information.
// If we cannot evaluate the condition (and the constraints are the same)
// the analyzer has no information about the value and just assuming it.
if (BRC.getStateManager().haveEqualConstraints(CurrentState, PreviousState) &&
CurrentState->getSVal(Cond, LCtx).isValid())
return nullptr;

// These will be modified in code below, but we need to preserve the original
// values in case we want to throw the generic message.
const Expr *CondTmp = Cond;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1945,7 +1951,6 @@ ConditionBRVisitor::VisitTrueTest(const Expr *Cond, bool tookTrue,

// Condition too complex to explain? Just say something so that the user
// knew we've made some path decision at this point.
const LocationContext *LCtx = N->getLocationContext();
PathDiagnosticLocation Loc(Cond, BRC.getSourceManager(), LCtx);
if (!Loc.isValid() || !Loc.asLocation().isValid())
return nullptr;
Expand Down
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion clang/test/Analysis/diagnostics/macros.cpp
Expand Up @@ -30,7 +30,8 @@ void testnullptrMacro(int *p) {

// There are no path notes on the comparison to float types.
void testDoubleMacro(double d) {
if (d == DBL_MAX) { // expected-note {{Taking true branch}}
if (d == DBL_MAX) { // expected-note {{Assuming 'd' is equal to DBL_MAX}}
// expected-note@-1 {{Taking true branch}}

char *p = NULL; // expected-note {{'p' initialized to a null pointer value}}
*p = 7; // expected-warning {{Dereference of null pointer (loaded from variable 'p')}}
Expand Down
11 changes: 8 additions & 3 deletions clang/test/Analysis/uninit-vals.m
Expand Up @@ -164,7 +164,8 @@ void PR14765_test() {
// expected-note@-1{{TRUE}}

testObj->origin = makePoint(0.0, 0.0);
if (testObj->size > 0) { ; } // expected-note{{Taking false branch}}
if (testObj->size > 0) { ; } // expected-note{{Assuming the condition is false}}
// expected-note@-1{{Taking false branch}}

// FIXME: Assigning to 'testObj->origin' kills the default binding for the
// whole region, meaning that we've forgotten that testObj->size should also
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -218,10 +219,14 @@ void PR14765_test_int() {
// expected-note@-1{{TRUE}}

testObj->origin = makeIntPoint(1, 2);
if (testObj->size > 0) { ; } // expected-note{{Taking false branch}}
if (testObj->size > 0) { ; } // expected-note{{Assuming the condition is false}}
// expected-note@-1{{Taking false branch}}
// expected-note@-2{{Taking false branch}}
// expected-note@-2{{Assuming the condition is false}}
// expected-note@-3{{Taking false branch}}
// expected-note@-4{{Assuming the condition is false}}
// expected-note@-5{{Taking false branch}}
// expected-note@-6{{Assuming the condition is false}}
// expected-note@-7{{Taking false branch}}

// FIXME: Assigning to 'testObj->origin' kills the default binding for the
// whole region, meaning that we've forgotten that testObj->size should also
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 9ea2f90

Please sign in to comment.