[clang][Sema] Skip the RequiresExprBodyDecls for lambda dependencies (#…

…83997)

The dependency of a lambda inside of a `RequiresExprBodyDecl` was
previously affected by its parent, e.g.,
`ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl`. This made the lambda always dependent
regardless of the template arguments we had, which caused some crashes
on the constraint evaluation later.

This fixes #56556, fixes
#82849 and a case
demonstrated by
#49570 (comment).

clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst

@@ -319,6 +319,8 @@ Bug Fixes to C++ Support
   Fixes (#GH80630)
 - Fix a crash when an explicit template argument list is used with a name for which lookup
   finds a non-template function and a dependent using declarator.
+- Fixed an issue where the ``RequiresExprBody`` was involved in the lambda dependency
+  calculation. (#GH56556), (#GH82849).
 - Fix a bug where overload resolution falsely reported an ambiguity when it was comparing
   a member-function against a non member function or a member-function with an
   explicit object parameter against a member function with no explicit object parameter

clang/lib/Sema/TreeTransform.h

@@ -13649,10 +13649,29 @@ TreeTransform<Derived>::TransformLambdaExpr(LambdaExpr *E) {
   // use evaluation contexts to distinguish the function parameter case.
   CXXRecordDecl::LambdaDependencyKind DependencyKind =
       CXXRecordDecl::LDK_Unknown;
+  DeclContext *DC = getSema().CurContext;
+  // A RequiresExprBodyDecl is not interesting for dependencies.
+  // For the following case,
+  //
+  // template <typename>
+  // concept C = requires { [] {}; };
+  //
+  // template <class F>
+  // struct Widget;
+  //
+  // template <C F>
+  // struct Widget<F> {};
+  //
+  // While we are substituting Widget<F>, the parent of DC would be
+  // the template specialization itself. Thus, the lambda expression
+  // will be deemed as dependent even if there are no dependent template
+  // arguments.
+  // (A ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl is always a dependent context.)
+  while (DC->getDeclKind() == Decl::Kind::RequiresExprBody)
+    DC = DC->getParent();
   if ((getSema().isUnevaluatedContext() ||
        getSema().isConstantEvaluatedContext()) &&
-      (getSema().CurContext->isFileContext() ||
-       !getSema().CurContext->getParent()->isDependentContext()))
+      (DC->isFileContext() || !DC->getParent()->isDependentContext()))
     DependencyKind = CXXRecordDecl::LDK_NeverDependent;
 
   CXXRecordDecl *OldClass = E->getLambdaClass();

clang/test/SemaTemplate/concepts-lambda.cpp

@@ -90,6 +90,64 @@ struct Foo {
 
 static_assert(ConstructibleWithN<Foo>);
 
+namespace GH56556 {
+
+template <typename It>
+inline constexpr It declare ();
+
+template <typename It, template <typename> typename Template>
+concept D = requires {
+	{ [] <typename T1> (Template<T1> &) {}(declare<It &>()) };
+};
+
+template <typename T>
+struct B {};
+
+template <typename T>
+struct Adapter;
+
+template <D<B> T>
+struct Adapter<T> {};
+
+template struct Adapter<B<int>>;
+
+} // namespace GH56556
+
+namespace GH82849 {
+
+template <class T>
+concept C = requires(T t) {
+  requires requires (T u) {
+    []<class V>(V) {
+      return requires(V v) {
+        [](V w) {}(v);
+      };
+    }(t);
+  };
+};
+
+template <class From>
+struct Widget;
+
+template <C F>
+struct Widget<F> {
+  static F create(F from) {
+    return from;
+  }
+};
+
+template <class>
+bool foo() {
+  return C<int>;
+}
+
+void bar() {
+  // https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/49570#issuecomment-1664966972
+  Widget<char>::create(0);
+}
+
+} // namespace GH82849
+
 }
 
 // GH60642 reported an assert being hit, make sure we don't assert.